QQQ vs SNSR
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Global X Internet of Things ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SNSR?
Large Cap Growth against Mid Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SNSR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.68% |
| AUM | $506.1B | $205M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.47% |
| Holdings | 321 | 73 |
| YTD Return | +19.30% | +25.43%Best |
| 1Y Return | +22.47%Best | +22.06% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.18%Best | +16.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.42%Best | +5.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.0%Best | 22.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1%Best | -38.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,484Best | $13,263 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.7%Best | 50.0% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Sep 12, 2016 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2016 to Oct 14, 2026 (10.1 years).
QQQ vs SNSR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.1 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs SNSR Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% while SNSR returned +22.06%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a gain of 25.43% for SNSR.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.18% per year against +16.37% for SNSR; over five years the annualized figures are +15.42% and +5.81% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +20.28% annualized vs +12.22%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNSR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.5% compared with 19.0% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -38.5% for SNSR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SNSR charges 0.68%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $68 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.47% for SNSR.
Holdings Overlap
4.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings SNSR also owns. 13.8% of SNSR's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
SNSR and QQQ share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 71 in SNSR, against full books of 321 and 73.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 39 positions for SNSR that do not appear in our book for QQQ (57.2% of the fund), and 87 for QQQ that do not appear in SNSR (92.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SNSR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SNSR?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SNSR charges 0.68%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or SNSR?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% vs +22.06% for SNSR, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), QQQ annualized +20.28% vs +12.22% for SNSR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SNSR?
SNSR has been the more volatile fund at 22.5% annualized versus 19.0% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs SNSR -38.5%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SNSR?
QQQ and SNSR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SNSR?
13.8% of SNSR's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 13.8% of SNSR's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 71 in SNSR.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SNSR?
QQQ yields 0.42% while SNSR yields 0.47%, so SNSR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SNSR better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.