QQQ vs WBIF
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
Which is better, QQQ or WBIF?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 1.65% |
| AUM | $506.1B | $23M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 321 | 152 |
| YTD Return | +19.30%Best | +14.87% |
| 1Y Return | +22.47%Best | +15.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.18%Best | +10.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.42%Best | +4.01% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1% | -20.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,484Best | $12,172 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 27, 2014 to Oct 14, 2026 (12.1 years).
QQQ vs WBIF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs WBIF Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% while WBIF returned +15.37%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a gain of 14.87% for WBIF.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.18% per year against +10.35% for WBIF; over five years the annualized figures are +15.42% and +4.01% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.16% annualized vs +3.90%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 12.1% for WBIF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -20.3% for WBIF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WBIF charges 1.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $165 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for WBIF.
Holdings Overlap
At least 4.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings WBIF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for WBIF, our book for it covers 83.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
QQQ and WBIF share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 62 in WBIF, against full books of 321 and 152.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in WBIF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 1.80% | 1.12% | 0.68% |
| ROSTRoss Stores, Inc. | 0.31% | 2.47% | 2.16% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.95% | 1.43% | 0.48% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing Inc. | 0.43% | 1.50% | 1.07% |
| NBIS:ASNebius Group Nv | 0.23% | 1.12% | 0.89% |
| CRWVCoreweave, Inc. | 0.17% | 1.07% | 0.90% |
| ROPRoper Technologies Inc. | 0.14% | 1.03% | 0.89% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 0.15% | 0.89% | 0.74% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and WBIF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WBIF?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WBIF charges 1.65%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $147 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or WBIF?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.47% vs +15.37% for WBIF, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QQQ annualized +18.16% vs +3.90% for WBIF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WBIF?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 12.1% for WBIF. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs WBIF -20.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WBIF?
QQQ and WBIF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WBIF?
At least 4.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings WBIF also owns. Our book for WBIF is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 62 in WBIF.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WBIF?
QQQ yields 0.42% while WBIF yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIF better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.