QQQ vs ZINC
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Zacks Income ETF
Which is better, QQQ or ZINC?
Large Cap Growth against All Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | ZINC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $498.6B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 321 | 54 |
| YTD Return | +21.69%Best | +2.59% |
| 1Y Return | +24.10% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.05% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.31% | - |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Zacks |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QQQ vs ZINC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs ZINC Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Zacks Income ETF (ZINC) is an ETF from Zacks. Year to date, QQQ is up 21.69% versus a gain of 2.59% for ZINC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while ZINC charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $55 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for ZINC.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings ZINC also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ZINC, our book for it covers 94.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
QQQ and ZINC share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 55 in ZINC, against full books of 321 and 54.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and ZINC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or ZINC?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while ZINC charges 0.55%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and ZINC?
At least 1.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings ZINC also owns. Our book for ZINC is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 55 in ZINC.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or ZINC?
QQQ yields 0.42% while ZINC yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZINC better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.