VYM vs ZINC
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs Zacks Income ETF
Which is better, VYM or ZINC?
Large Cap Value against All Cap Blend.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VYM | ZINC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $78.9B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.37% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 608 | 54 |
| YTD Return | +11.83%Best | +2.84% |
| 1Y Return | +15.96% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.60% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.51% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.8%Best | 33.9% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Zacks |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2006 | Jun 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
VYM vs ZINC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VYM vs ZINC Performance
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Zacks Income ETF (ZINC) is an ETF from Zacks. Year to date, VYM is up 11.83% versus a gain of 2.84% for ZINC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VYM charges 0.04% per year while ZINC charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $55 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.37% against 0.00% for ZINC.
Holdings Overlap
18.4% of VYM's money is in holdings ZINC also owns. 90.0% of ZINC's money is in holdings VYM also owns.
Most of ZINC is already inside VYM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
54 positions in common, counted across the 602 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 57 in ZINC, against full books of 608 and 54.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 602 and 57 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 519 positions ZINC does not, 79.4% of the fund.
Largest: AVGO 6.94%, JNJ 2.58%, ABBV 1.83%, CSCO 1.76%, BAC 1.65%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VYM | Weight in ZINC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.83% | 4.19% | 0.36% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 0.46% | 4.63% | 4.17% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.54% | 3.41% | 1.87% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 2.70% | 1.61% | 1.09% |
| VLOValero Energy | 0.43% | 3.51% | 3.08% |
| UNMUnum Group | 0.06% | 3.07% | 3.01% |
| TROWT Rowe Price Grp | 0.09% | 2.96% | 2.87% |
| PNWPinnacle West Corp | 0.05% | 2.94% | 2.89% |
| PFEPfizer Inc | 0.65% | 2.31% | 1.66% |
| FITBFifth Third Bancorp | 0.20% | 2.64% | 2.44% |
90.0% of ZINC is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VYM or ZINC?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while ZINC charges 0.55%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between VYM and ZINC?
90.0% of ZINC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 90.0% of ZINC's is in holdings VYM also owns. They hold 54 positions in common, counted across the 602 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 57 in ZINC.
Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or ZINC?
VYM yields 2.37% while ZINC yields 0.00%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZINC better than VYM?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.