QQQG vs QQQM
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Which is better, QQQG or QQQM?
Each has led over a different period.
QQQM has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y, QQQM over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. QQQM is less concentrated, with 46.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQG | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.15%Best |
| AUM | $52M | $111.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 104 | 327 |
| YTD Return | +27.13%Best | +19.32% |
| 1Y Return | +29.28%Best | +22.49% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.25% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.50% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2% | 17.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -22.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $14,801 | $15,220Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.9% | 46.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2024 | Oct 13, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 20, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.1 years).
QQQG vs QQQM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
QQQG vs QQQM Performance
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QQQG returned +29.28% while QQQM returned +22.49%. Year to date, QQQG is up 27.13% versus a gain of 19.32% for QQQM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 17.9% for QQQM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for QQQG and -22.7% for QQQM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQG charges 0.49% per year while QQQM charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $15 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQG currently yields 0.06% against 0.43% for QQQM.
Holdings Overlap
93.6% of QQQG's money is in holdings QQQM also owns. 58.8% of QQQM's money is in holdings QQQG also owns.
Most of QQQG is already inside QQQM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 102 in QQQM, against full books of 104 and 327.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 48 positions for QQQM that do not appear in our book for QQQG (39.2% of the fund), and 1 for QQQG that do not appear in QQQM (6.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQG | Weight in QQQM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 5.74% | 4.28% | 1.46% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.97% | 5.02% | 0.05% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.13% | 8.44% | 7.31% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.53% | 7.29% | 5.76% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 6.03% | 0.99% | 5.04% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.19% | 5.75% | 4.56% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 4.38% | 1.36% | 3.02% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 5.33% | 0.38% | 4.95% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 5.04% | 0.55% | 4.49% |
| ALABAstera Labs Inc - Common | 5.20% | 0.25% | 4.95% |
93.6% of QQQG is already inside QQQM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQG or QQQM?
QQQG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QQQM charges 0.15%. QQQM is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQG or QQQM?
Over the past year QQQG returned +29.28% vs +22.49% for QQQM, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQG annualized +20.53% vs +22.14% for QQQM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQG or QQQM?
QQQG has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 17.9% for QQQM. Worst drawdown: QQQG -23.6% vs QQQM -22.7%.
Should I hold both QQQG and QQQM?
QQQG and QQQM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQG and QQQM?
93.6% of QQQG's money is in holdings QQQM also owns. 58.8% of QQQM's is in holdings QQQG also owns. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 102 in QQQM.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQG or QQQM?
QQQG yields 0.06% while QQQM yields 0.43%, so QQQM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQM better than QQQG?
QQQM has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y, QQQM over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. QQQM is less concentrated, with 46.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.