QQQG vs QQQX
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
Which is better, QQQG or QQQX?
Each has led over a different period.
QQQG has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y, QQQX over the full window. QQQG is less concentrated, with 51.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQG | QQQX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.92% |
| AUM | $52M | $1.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 8.33% |
| Holdings | 104 | 286 |
| YTD Return | +27.13%Best | +15.65% |
| 1Y Return | +29.28%Best | +22.71% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.79% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.63% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -22.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $14,801 | $14,972Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.9%Best | 55.2% |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Nuveen |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2024 | Jan 30, 2007 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 20, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.1 years).
QQQG vs QQQX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
QQQG vs QQQX Performance
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) is an ETF from Nuveen. Over the past year QQQG returned +29.28% while QQQX returned +22.71%. Year to date, QQQG is up 27.13% versus a gain of 15.65% for QQQX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 14.1% for QQQX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for QQQG and -22.8% for QQQX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQG charges 0.49% per year while QQQX charges 0.92%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $92 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQG currently yields 0.06% against 8.33% for QQQX.
Holdings Overlap
28.2% of QQQG's money is in holdings QQQX also owns. 50.5% of QQQX's money is in holdings QQQG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 250 days apart, QQQG as of Oct 7, 2026 and QQQX as of Jan 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
17 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 261 in QQQX, against full books of 104 and 286.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 216 positions for QQQX that do not appear in our book for QQQG (44.0% of the fund), and 33 for QQQG that do not appear in QQQX (71.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQG | Weight in QQQX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.13% | 10.24% | 9.11% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.53% | 8.83% | 7.30% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.19% | 7.86% | 6.67% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 5.74% | 2.49% | 3.25% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.21% | 4.31% | 3.10% |
| ALABAstera Labs Inc - Common | 5.20% | 0.02% | 5.18% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.37% | 2.57% | 0.20% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 1.51% | 1.92% | 0.41% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.85% | 1.90% | 1.05% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 1.21% | 1.49% | 0.28% |
50.5% of QQQX is already inside QQQG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQG or QQQX?
QQQG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QQQX charges 0.92%. QQQG is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQG or QQQX?
Over the past year QQQG returned +29.28% vs +22.71% for QQQX, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQG annualized +20.53% vs +21.19% for QQQX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQG or QQQX?
QQQG has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 14.1% for QQQX. Worst drawdown: QQQG -23.6% vs QQQX -22.8%.
Should I hold both QQQG and QQQX?
QQQG and QQQX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQG and QQQX?
50.5% of QQQX's money is in holdings QQQG also owns. 50.5% of QQQX's is in holdings QQQG also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 261 in QQQX.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQG or QQQX?
QQQG yields 0.06% while QQQX yields 8.33%, so QQQX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQX better than QQQG?
QQQG has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y, QQQX over the full window. QQQG is less concentrated, with 51.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.