QQQG vs QRMI
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Which is better, QQQG or QRMI?
QQQG has been ahead.
QQQG has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y and the full window. QRMI is less concentrated, with 48.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQG | QRMI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $52M | $15M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 12.35% |
| Holdings | 104 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +27.13%Best | +4.65% |
| 1Y Return | +29.28%Best | +8.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.12% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +2.56% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2% | 6.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -8.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $14,801Best | $11,613 |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.9% | 48.7%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | GLOBALXETFS |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2024 | Aug 25, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 20, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.1 years).
QQQG vs QRMI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
QQQG vs QRMI Performance
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is an ETF from GLOBALXETFS. Over the past year QQQG returned +29.28% while QRMI returned +8.47%. Year to date, QQQG is up 27.13% versus a gain of 4.65% for QRMI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 6.1% for QRMI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for QQQG and -8.4% for QRMI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQG charges 0.49% per year while QRMI charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $60 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQG currently yields 0.06% against 12.35% for QRMI.
Holdings Overlap
99.9% of QQQG's money is in holdings QRMI also owns. 62.7% of QRMI's money is in holdings QQQG also owns.
Most of QQQG is already inside QRMI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
50 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 101 in QRMI, against full books of 104 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 45 positions for QRMI that do not appear in our book for QQQG (39.1% of the fund), and 0 for QQQG that do not appear in QRMI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQG | Weight in QRMI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.97% | 5.40% | 0.43% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 5.74% | 4.37% | 1.37% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.13% | 8.77% | 7.64% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.53% | 7.60% | 6.07% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 6.29% | 1.14% | 5.15% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.19% | 6.00% | 4.81% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 6.03% | 1.02% | 5.01% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 4.38% | 1.40% | 2.98% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 5.33% | 0.41% | 4.92% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 5.04% | 0.57% | 4.47% |
99.9% of QQQG is already inside QRMI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQG or QRMI?
QQQG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QRMI charges 0.60%. QQQG is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQG or QRMI?
Over the past year QQQG returned +29.28% vs +8.47% for QRMI, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQG annualized +20.53% vs +7.38% for QRMI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQG or QRMI?
QQQG has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 6.1% for QRMI. Worst drawdown: QQQG -23.6% vs QRMI -8.4%.
Should I hold both QQQG and QRMI?
QQQG and QRMI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQG and QRMI?
99.9% of QQQG's money is in holdings QRMI also owns. 62.7% of QRMI's is in holdings QQQG also owns. They hold 50 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 101 in QRMI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQG or QRMI?
QQQG yields 0.06% while QRMI yields 12.35%, so QRMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QRMI better than QQQG?
QQQG has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y and the full window. QRMI is less concentrated, with 48.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.