QQQG vs QTOP
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
Which is better, QQQG or QTOP?
Each has led over a different period.
QTOP has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y, QTOP over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. QQQG is less concentrated, with 51.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQG | QTOP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.20%Best |
| AUM | $52M | $362M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 0.32% |
| Holdings | 104 | 35 |
| YTD Return | +27.13%Best | +20.85% |
| 1Y Return | +29.28%Best | +24.48% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.1% | 20.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -23.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $14,830 | $15,750Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.9%Best | 59.3% |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2024 | Oct 24, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
QQQG vs QTOP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
QQQG vs QTOP Performance
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year QQQG returned +29.28% while QTOP returned +24.48%. Year to date, QQQG is up 27.13% versus a gain of 20.85% for QTOP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.1% compared with 20.2% for QTOP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for QQQG and -23.1% for QTOP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQG charges 0.49% per year while QTOP charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $20 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQG currently yields 0.06% against 0.32% for QTOP.
Holdings Overlap
51.8% of QQQG's money is in holdings QTOP also owns. 63.0% of QTOP's money is in holdings QQQG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 32 in QTOP, against full books of 104 and 35.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 13 positions for QTOP that do not appear in our book for QQQG (35.8% of the fund), and 32 for QQQG that do not appear in QTOP (48.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQG | Weight in QTOP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.13% | 10.82% | 9.69% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.97% | 6.65% | 1.68% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 5.74% | 5.53% | 0.21% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.53% | 9.38% | 7.85% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.19% | 7.41% | 6.22% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 6.29% | 1.44% | 4.85% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 6.03% | 1.29% | 4.74% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 4.38% | 1.78% | 2.60% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 4.29% | 1.50% | 2.79% |
| STXSeagate Technolo | 4.54% | 1.18% | 3.36% |
63.0% of QTOP is already inside QQQG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQG or QTOP?
QQQG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QTOP charges 0.20%. QTOP is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQG or QTOP?
Over the past year QQQG returned +29.28% vs +24.48% for QTOP, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQG annualized +21.78% vs +25.50% for QTOP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQG or QTOP?
QQQG has been the more volatile fund at 23.1% annualized versus 20.2% for QTOP. Worst drawdown: QQQG -23.6% vs QTOP -23.1%.
Should I hold both QQQG and QTOP?
QQQG and QTOP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQG and QTOP?
63.0% of QTOP's money is in holdings QQQG also owns. 63.0% of QTOP's is in holdings QQQG also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 32 in QTOP.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQG or QTOP?
QQQG yields 0.06% while QTOP yields 0.32%, so QTOP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QTOP better than QQQG?
QTOP has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y, QTOP over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. QQQG is less concentrated, with 51.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.