QQQG vs QTR
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
Which is better, QQQG or QTR?
QQQG has been ahead.
QTR has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. QTR is less concentrated, with 46.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQG | QTR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.25%Best |
| AUM | $52M | $10M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 16.32% |
| Holdings | 104 | 105 |
| YTD Return | +27.13%Best | +12.97% |
| 1Y Return | +29.28%Best | +14.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.02% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.44% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2% | 17.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -19.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $14,801Best | $13,514 |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.9% | 46.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | GLOBALXETFS |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2024 | Aug 25, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 20, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.1 years).
QQQG vs QTR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
QQQG vs QTR Performance
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) is an ETF from GLOBALXETFS. Over the past year QQQG returned +29.28% while QTR returned +14.42%. Year to date, QQQG is up 27.13% versus a gain of 12.97% for QTR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 17.0% for QTR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for QQQG and -19.0% for QTR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQG charges 0.49% per year while QTR charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $25 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQG currently yields 0.06% against 16.32% for QTR.
Holdings Overlap
99.9% of QQQG's money is in holdings QTR also owns. 59.6% of QTR's money is in holdings QQQG also owns.
Most of QQQG is already inside QTR. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
50 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 101 in QTR, against full books of 104 and 105.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 44 positions for QTR that do not appear in our book for QQQG (37.1% of the fund), and 0 for QQQG that do not appear in QTR (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQG | Weight in QTR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.97% | 5.13% | 0.16% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 5.74% | 4.16% | 1.58% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.13% | 8.35% | 7.22% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.53% | 7.24% | 5.71% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 6.29% | 1.08% | 5.21% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 6.03% | 0.97% | 5.06% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.19% | 5.71% | 4.52% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 5.33% | 0.39% | 4.94% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 4.38% | 1.33% | 3.05% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 5.04% | 0.54% | 4.50% |
99.9% of QQQG is already inside QTR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQG or QTR?
QQQG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QTR charges 0.25%. QTR is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQG or QTR?
Over the past year QQQG returned +29.28% vs +14.42% for QTR, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQG annualized +20.53% vs +15.42% for QTR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQG or QTR?
QQQG has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 17.0% for QTR. Worst drawdown: QQQG -23.6% vs QTR -19.0%.
Should I hold both QQQG and QTR?
QQQG and QTR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQG and QTR?
99.9% of QQQG's money is in holdings QTR also owns. 59.6% of QTR's is in holdings QQQG also owns. They hold 50 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 101 in QTR.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQG or QTR?
QQQG yields 0.06% while QTR yields 16.32%, so QTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QTR better than QQQG?
QTR has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. QTR is less concentrated, with 46.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.