QQQG vs TEC
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF
Which is better, QQQG or TEC?
Each has led over a different period.
QQQG has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y, TEC over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. TEC is less concentrated, with 50.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQG | TEC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.69% |
| AUM | $52M | $7M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 104 | 88 |
| YTD Return | +27.13%Best | +20.68% |
| 1Y Return | +29.28%Best | +22.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.4% | 21.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.8%Best | -17.5% |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $16,586 | $17,518Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.9% | 50.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2024 | Apr 16, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 17, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.5 years).
QQQG vs TEC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
QQQG vs TEC Performance
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Over the past year QQQG returned +29.28% while TEC returned +22.30%. Year to date, QQQG is up 27.13% versus a gain of 20.68% for TEC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.4% compared with 21.8% for TEC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for QQQG and -17.5% for TEC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQG charges 0.49% per year while TEC charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $69 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQG currently yields 0.06% against 0.00% for TEC.
Holdings Overlap
38.9% of QQQG's money is in holdings TEC also owns. 52.8% of TEC's money is in holdings QQQG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 44 in TEC, against full books of 104 and 88.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 22 positions for TEC that do not appear in our book for QQQG (37.5% of the fund), and 33 for QQQG that do not appear in TEC (61.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQG | Weight in TEC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 5.74% | 5.24% | 0.50% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.53% | 7.92% | 6.39% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.97% | 3.34% | 1.63% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 5.33% | 2.67% | 2.66% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.13% | 6.86% | 5.73% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 4.29% | 2.95% | 1.34% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.19% | 5.88% | 4.69% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 4.38% | 2.09% | 2.29% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 1.78% | 4.38% | 2.60% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.21% | 3.35% | 2.14% |
52.8% of TEC is already inside QQQG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQG or TEC?
QQQG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while TEC charges 0.69%. QQQG is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQG or TEC?
Over the past year QQQG returned +29.28% vs +22.30% for TEC, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQG annualized +40.12% vs +45.32% for TEC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQG or TEC?
QQQG has been the more volatile fund at 24.4% annualized versus 21.8% for TEC. Worst drawdown: QQQG -13.8% vs TEC -17.5%.
Should I hold both QQQG and TEC?
QQQG and TEC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQG and TEC?
52.8% of TEC's money is in holdings QQQG also owns. 52.8% of TEC's is in holdings QQQG also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QQQG and 44 in TEC.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQG or TEC?
QQQG yields 0.06% while TEC yields 0.00%, so QQQG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TEC better than QQQG?
QQQG has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y, TEC over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. TEC is less concentrated, with 50.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.