QQQI vs ROCQ

QQQI vs ROCQ

Which is better, QQQI or ROCQ?

ROCQ costs less.

ROCQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQI is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.3%.

Lower Fees: ROCQLess Concentrated: QQQI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQIROCQ
Expense Ratio0.68%0.35%Best
AUM$15.3B$740M
Dividend Yield13.76%5.12%
Holdings209103
YTD Return+13.56%+17.21%Best
1Y Return+16.95%-
Top 10 Weight46.5%Best54.3%
Fund FamilyNEOSJ.P. Morgan Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 30, 2024Mar 18, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQI vs ROCQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare QQQI against instead:QQQI vs SPYQQQI vs QQQQQQI vs VOOQQQI vs VTIROCQ against:ROCQ vs VXUS

QQQI vs ROCQ Performance

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is an ETF from NEOS and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Year to date, QQQI is up 13.56% versus a gain of 17.21% for ROCQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQI charges 0.68% per year while ROCQ charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $35 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQI currently yields 13.76% against 5.12% for ROCQ.

Holdings Overlap

QQQI already in ROCQ65.2%
ROCQ already in QQQI81.7%

65.2% of QQQI's money is in holdings ROCQ also owns. 81.7% of ROCQ's money is in holdings QQQI also owns.

Most of ROCQ is already inside QQQI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

32 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQI and 96 in ROCQ, against full books of 209 and 103.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 59 positions for ROCQ that do not appear in our book for QQQI (16.6% of the fund), and 65 for QQQI that do not appear in ROCQ (32.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQIWeight in ROCQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.13%9.14%1.01%
AAPLApple, Inc7.71%7.68%0.03%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.97%6.61%0.64%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.57%5.90%1.33%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.34%4.55%0.21%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C3.00%5.80%2.80%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.54%4.79%1.25%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.14%3.64%0.50%
WMTWalmart, Inc.2.34%3.12%0.78%
TSLATesla Inc2.86%2.47%0.39%

81.7% of ROCQ is already inside QQQI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQIROCQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQI or ROCQ?

QQQI has an expense ratio of 0.68% while ROCQ charges 0.35%. ROCQ is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQI and ROCQ?

81.7% of ROCQ's money is in holdings QQQI also owns. 81.7% of ROCQ's is in holdings QQQI also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQI and 96 in ROCQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQI or ROCQ?

QQQI yields 13.76% while ROCQ yields 5.12%, so QQQI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ROCQ better than QQQI?

ROCQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQI is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.