QQXT vs VTI
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QQXT or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. QQXT is less concentrated, with 20.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQXT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $132M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.33% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 110 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -0.39% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.77% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.36% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.43% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 15.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -57.5% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,837 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.9%Best | 33.5% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 8, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 15, 2007 to Oct 14, 2026 (19.7 years).
QQXT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.7 years both funds cover.
QQXT vs VTI Performance
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQXT returned +0.77% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, QQXT is down 0.39% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, QQXT compounded at +7.36% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.43% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.19% annualized vs +8.68%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQXT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.5% for QQXT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQXT charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQXT currently yields 1.33% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
90.8% of QQXT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 10.8% of VTI's money is in holdings QQXT also owns.
Most of QQXT is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
49 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in QQXT and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 110 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,107 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for QQXT (86.8% of the fund), and 1 for QQXT that do not appear in VTI (3.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQXT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.90% | 3.41% | 1.51% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 1.97% | 1.40% | 0.57% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.95% | 0.62% | 1.33% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.99% | 0.53% | 1.46% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 2.32% | 0.10% | 2.22% |
| RKLBRocket Lab Corp | 2.26% | 0.05% | 2.21% |
| SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies Corp. | 2.17% | 0.11% | 2.06% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc | 2.04% | 0.18% | 1.86% |
| WBDWarner Bros. Discovery, Inc | 2.12% | 0.09% | 2.03% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 1.94% | 0.25% | 1.69% |
90.8% of QQXT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQXT or VTI?
QQXT has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQXT or VTI?
Over the past year QQXT returned +0.77% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), QQXT annualized +8.68% vs +9.19% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQXT or VTI?
QQXT has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QQXT -57.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QQXT and VTI?
QQXT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQXT and VTI?
90.8% of QQXT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 10.8% of VTI's is in holdings QQXT also owns. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in QQXT and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQXT or VTI?
QQXT yields 1.33% while VTI yields 1.06%, so QQXT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QQXT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. QQXT is less concentrated, with 20.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.