RFI vs VTI

RFI vs VTI

Which is better, RFI or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRFIVTI
Expense Ratio0.89%0.03%Best
AUM$297M$689.2B
Dividend Yield8.74%1.06%
Holdings1933,524
YTD Return-0.25%+13.02%Best
1Y Return-5.04%+16.63%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+8.00%+21.97%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-1.24%+11.99%Best
Volatility (annualized)22.8%15.5%Best
Max Drawdown-80.1%-56.6%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$9,395$17,616Best
Fund FamilyCohen & Steers FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 27, 1993May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 22, 2005 to Oct 14, 2026 (20.8 years).

RFI vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20.8 years both funds cover.

RFI vs VTI Performance

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund Inc. (RFI) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RFI returned -5.04% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, RFI is down 0.25% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Over three years, RFI compounded at +8.00% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -1.24% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.40% annualized vs -0.43%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RFI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.8% compared with 15.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.1% for RFI and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RFI charges 0.89% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RFI currently yields 8.74% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

VTI already in RFI2.1%

At least 2.1% of VTI's money is in holdings RFI also owns.

Stated as a floor: for RFI, our book for it covers 94.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

VTI and RFI share little of their money.

The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, RFI as of Jun 30, 2026 and VTI as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

39 positions in common, counted across the 166 positions we hold weights for in RFI and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 193 and 3,524.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RFIWeight in VTIDifference
WELLWelltower, Inc.13.20%0.23%12.97%
DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc.7.02%0.09%6.93%
AMTAmerican Tower Corporation5.31%0.11%5.20%
CCICrown Castle International Corp4.21%0.05%4.16%
PLDPrologis Inc4.00%0.18%3.82%
KIMKimco Realty Corp.3.22%0.02%3.20%
EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust2.91%0.14%2.77%
PSAPublic Storage2.92%0.07%2.85%
EXRExtra Space Storage Inc2.88%0.04%2.84%
SPGSimon Property Group Inc2.59%0.09%2.50%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of RFI and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

RFIVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RFI or VTI?

RFI has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, RFI or VTI?

Over the past year RFI returned -5.04% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), RFI annualized -0.43% vs +9.40% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, RFI or VTI?

RFI has been the more volatile fund at 22.8% annualized versus 15.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RFI -80.1% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both RFI and VTI?

RFI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between RFI and VTI?

At least 2.1% of VTI's money is in holdings RFI also owns. Our book for RFI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 166 positions we hold weights for in RFI and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, RFI or VTI?

RFI yields 8.74% while VTI yields 1.06%, so RFI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than RFI?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.