RGEF vs VTI
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RGEF or VTI?
RGEF has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RGEF led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGEF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $826M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.95% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 134 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +14.24%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +20.05%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4%Best | 12.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.0%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $14,309Best | $13,544 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.8% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Rockefeller Capital Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
RGEF vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
RGEF vs VTI Performance
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) is an ETF from Rockefeller Capital Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RGEF returned +20.05% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, RGEF is up 14.24% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 11.4% for RGEF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for RGEF and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGEF charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGEF currently yields 0.95% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
57.6% of RGEF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 36.4% of VTI's money is in holdings RGEF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
30 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in RGEF and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 134 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,126 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RGEF (61.2% of the fund), and 3 for RGEF that do not appear in VTI (5.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RGEF | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.12% | 6.88% | 2.76% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.83% | 5.11% | 0.28% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.02% | 6.30% | 3.28% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 5.38% | 2.70% | 2.68% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.33% | 3.41% | 0.08% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.50% | 1.70% | 1.80% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.92% | 2.38% | 0.46% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.03% | 1.04% | 1.99% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.57% | 0.49% | 2.08% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.72% | 1.29% | 0.43% |
57.6% of RGEF is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGEF or VTI?
RGEF has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RGEF or VTI?
Over the past year RGEF returned +20.05% vs +16.63% for VTI, so RGEF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RGEF annualized +19.62% vs +16.38% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RGEF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 11.4% for RGEF. Worst drawdown: RGEF -16.0% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both RGEF and VTI?
RGEF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RGEF and VTI?
57.6% of RGEF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 36.4% of VTI's is in holdings RGEF also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in RGEF and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGEF or VTI?
RGEF yields 0.95% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RGEF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RGEF led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.