RGLO vs RWIN
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF
Which is better, RGLO or RWIN?
RWIN costs less.
RWIN has a lower expense ratio. RWIN is less concentrated, with 21.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGLO | RWIN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.42%Best |
| AUM | $368M | $20M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 1.20% |
| Holdings | 384 | 333 |
| YTD Return | +12.16%Best | +4.88% |
| 1Y Return | +17.93% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.2% | 21.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Russell Investments | Rayliant Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 29, 2025 | Apr 8, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
RGLO vs RWIN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RGLO vs RWIN Performance
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) is an ETF from Russell Investments and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor International Equity ETF (RWIN) is an ETF from Rayliant Asset Management. Year to date, RGLO is up 12.16% versus a gain of 4.88% for RWIN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGLO charges 0.49% per year while RWIN charges 0.42%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $42 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGLO currently yields 0.57% against 1.20% for RWIN.
Holdings Overlap
3.0% of RGLO's money is in holdings RWIN also owns. 12.5% of RWIN's money is in holdings RGLO also owns.
RWIN and RGLO share little of their money.
16 positions in common, counted across the 346 positions we hold weights for in RGLO and 165 in RWIN, against full books of 384 and 333.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 0 positions for RWIN that do not appear in our book for RGLO (1.7% of the fund), and 106 for RGLO that do not appear in RWIN (51.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RGLO | Weight in RWIN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASASML HOLDING NV | 0.60% | 2.50% | 1.90% |
| 8750:JPDaiichi Life Group Inc | 0.12% | 1.69% | 1.57% |
| GALD:SMGalderma | 0.10% | 1.40% | 1.30% |
| 8309:JPSumitomo Mitsui Trust Group | 0.25% | 1.19% | 0.94% |
| NN:ASNn Group Nv | 0.21% | 1.02% | 0.81% |
| STAN:LNStandard Chartered Bank | 0.37% | 0.58% | 0.21% |
| ALL:AUAristocrat Leisure Ltd. | 0.10% | 0.80% | 0.70% |
| UBSG:SMUbs Group Ag Ordinary Shares | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.06% |
| IAG:CAIa Financial Corp Inc Common Stock 0 Nan | 0.14% | 0.58% | 0.44% |
| RO:SMRoche Holding Ag Br | 0.05% | 0.58% | 0.53% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RGLO and RWIN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGLO or RWIN?
RGLO has an expense ratio of 0.49% while RWIN charges 0.42%. RWIN is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between RGLO and RWIN?
12.5% of RWIN's money is in holdings RGLO also owns. 12.5% of RWIN's is in holdings RGLO also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 346 positions we hold weights for in RGLO and 165 in RWIN.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGLO or RWIN?
RGLO yields 0.57% while RWIN yields 1.20%, so RWIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWIN better than RGLO?
RWIN has a lower expense ratio. RWIN is less concentrated, with 21.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.