RGLO vs THOR
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF vs Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF
Which is better, RGLO or THOR?
RGLO costs less.
RGLO has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGLO | THOR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $368M | $38M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 384 | 59 |
| YTD Return | +11.84%Best | +0.77% |
| 1Y Return | +18.24% | - |
| Fund Family | Russell Investments | Thornburg Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 29, 2025 | Jun 22, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
RGLO vs THOR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RGLO vs THOR Performance
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) is an ETF from Russell Investments and Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF (THOR) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Year to date, RGLO is up 11.84% versus a gain of 0.77% for THOR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGLO charges 0.49% per year while THOR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $79 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGLO currently yields 0.57% against 0.43% for THOR.
Holdings Overlap
At least 7.6% of RGLO's money is in holdings THOR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for THOR, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
RGLO and THOR share little of their money.
18 positions in common, counted across the 346 positions we hold weights for in RGLO and 54 in THOR, against full books of 384 and 59.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RGLO | Weight in THOR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.75% | 2.73% | 0.98% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 1.44% | 2.79% | 1.35% |
| BNPP:PABNP PARIBAS | 0.34% | 3.33% | 2.99% |
| TTEF:PATotalEnergies SE | 0.45% | 2.90% | 2.45% |
| TAT&T Inc. | 0.12% | 2.93% | 2.81% |
| NN:ASNn Group Nv | 0.21% | 2.61% | 2.40% |
| CMEC M E Group Inc. | 0.56% | 2.15% | 1.59% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.46% | 1.99% | 1.53% |
| AZN:LNAstraZeneca PLC | 0.23% | 2.21% | 1.98% |
| BIRG:IEBank of Ireland Group PLC Ordinary Stock Units Eur 1.00 | 0.18% | 2.00% | 1.82% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RGLO and THOR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGLO or THOR?
RGLO has an expense ratio of 0.49% while THOR charges 0.79%. RGLO is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between RGLO and THOR?
At least 7.6% of RGLO's money is in holdings THOR also owns. Our book for THOR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 346 positions we hold weights for in RGLO and 54 in THOR.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGLO or THOR?
RGLO yields 0.57% while THOR yields 0.43%, so RGLO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is THOR better than RGLO?
RGLO has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.