RGLO vs URTH
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF vs iShares MSCI World ETF
Which is better, RGLO or URTH?
Nearly the same fund. URTH costs less.
URTH has a lower expense ratio. RGLO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. RGLO is less concentrated, with 26.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 27.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGLO | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.24%Best |
| AUM | $368M | $8.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 1.38% |
| Holdings | 384 | 1,310 |
| YTD Return | +11.84% | +11.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.24%Best | +16.36% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.92% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.34% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.0%Best | 10.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.6% | -9.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $13,219Best | $12,941 |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.2%Best | 27.7% |
| Fund Family | Russell Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 29, 2025 | Jan 10, 2012 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 30, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
RGLO vs URTH growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
RGLO vs URTH Performance
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) is an ETF from Russell Investments and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year RGLO returned +18.24% while URTH returned +16.36%. Year to date, RGLO is up 11.84% versus a gain of 11.87% for URTH.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
URTH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.5% compared with 10.0% for RGLO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.6% for RGLO and -9.1% for URTH. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGLO charges 0.49% per year while URTH charges 0.24%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $24 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGLO currently yields 0.57% against 1.38% for URTH.
Holdings Overlap
65.1% of RGLO's money is in holdings URTH also owns. 53.8% of URTH's money is in holdings RGLO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
191 positions in common, counted across the 346 positions we hold weights for in RGLO and 1,220 in URTH, against full books of 384 and 1,310.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 402 positions for URTH that do not appear in our book for RGLO (27.2% of the fund), and 0 for RGLO that do not appear in URTH (1.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RGLO | Weight in URTH | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.99% | 5.86% | 0.87% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.51% | 5.36% | 0.85% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.30% | 3.99% | 0.69% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.83% | 1.73% | 1.10% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.96% | 1.76% | 0.20% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 1.38% | 2.19% | 0.81% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.75% | 1.71% | 0.04% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.82% | 1.36% | 0.54% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 0.98% | 1.02% | 0.04% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 0.69% | 1.12% | 0.43% |
65.1% of RGLO is already inside URTH.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGLO or URTH?
RGLO has an expense ratio of 0.49% while URTH charges 0.24%. URTH is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RGLO or URTH?
Over the past year RGLO returned +18.24% vs +16.36% for URTH, so RGLO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RGLO annualized +22.06% vs +20.22% for URTH. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RGLO or URTH?
URTH has been the more volatile fund at 10.5% annualized versus 10.0% for RGLO. Worst drawdown: RGLO -9.6% vs URTH -9.1%.
Should I hold both RGLO and URTH?
RGLO and URTH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RGLO and URTH?
65.1% of RGLO's money is in holdings URTH also owns. 53.8% of URTH's is in holdings RGLO also owns. They hold 191 positions in common, counted across the 346 positions we hold weights for in RGLO and 1,220 in URTH.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGLO or URTH?
RGLO yields 0.57% while URTH yields 1.38%, so URTH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is URTH better than RGLO?
URTH has a lower expense ratio. RGLO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. RGLO is less concentrated, with 26.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 27.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.