RJCA vs XAIW
RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF vs SpaceXAI Lab Ecosystem ETF
Which is better, RJCA or XAIW?
XAIW costs less.
XAIW has a lower expense ratio. RJCA is less concentrated, with 57.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RJCA | XAIW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.59%Best |
| AUM | $617M | $1M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 72 | 25 |
| YTD Return | +4.02%Best | -3.89% |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.0%Best | 61.4% |
| Fund Family | Carillon Family of Funds | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 21, 2006 | Aug 12, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
RJCA vs XAIW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RJCA vs XAIW Performance
RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF (RJCA) is an ETF from Carillon Family of Funds and SpaceXAI Lab Ecosystem ETF (XAIW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, RJCA is up 4.02% versus a loss of 3.89% for XAIW.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RJCA charges 0.61% per year while XAIW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $59 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RJCA currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XAIW.
Holdings Overlap
26.9% of RJCA's money is in holdings XAIW also owns. 22.2% of XAIW's money is in holdings RJCA also owns.
RJCA and XAIW share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in RJCA and 26 in XAIW, against full books of 72 and 25.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 14 positions for XAIW that do not appear in our book for RJCA (58.3% of the fund), and 64 for RJCA that do not appear in XAIW (72.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
26.9% of RJCA is already inside XAIW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RJCA or XAIW?
RJCA has an expense ratio of 0.61% while XAIW charges 0.59%. XAIW is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between RJCA and XAIW?
26.9% of RJCA's money is in holdings XAIW also owns. 22.2% of XAIW's is in holdings RJCA also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in RJCA and 26 in XAIW.
Which pays a higher dividend, RJCA or XAIW?
RJCA yields 0.00% while XAIW yields 0.00%, so XAIW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XAIW better than RJCA?
XAIW has a lower expense ratio. RJCA is less concentrated, with 57.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.