ROSC vs SQLV
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF vs Royce Quant Small Cap Quality Value ETF
Which is better, ROSC or SQLV?
Nearly the same fund. ROSC costs less.
ROSC has a lower expense ratio. ROSC led over 3Y and 5Y, SQLV over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. SQLV is less concentrated, with 7.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 9.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ROSC | SQLV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $48M | $39M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.99% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 319 | 627 |
| YTD Return | +16.50% | +20.77%Best |
| 1Y Return | +23.06% | +23.79%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.89%Best | +14.77% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.74%Best | +7.00% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.3%Best | 22.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -46.3%Best | -49.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,204Best | $14,026 |
| Top 10 Weight | 9.9% | 7.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Small Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 23, 2015 | Jul 12, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 13, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (9.3 years).
ROSC vs SQLV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.3 years both funds cover.
ROSC vs SQLV Performance
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and Royce Quant Small Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year ROSC returned +23.06% while SQLV returned +23.79%. Year to date, ROSC is up 16.50% versus a gain of 20.77% for SQLV.
Over three years, ROSC compounded at +16.89% per year against +14.77% for SQLV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.74% and +7.00% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SQLV has the edge at +8.84% annualized vs +8.26%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SQLV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.5% compared with 19.3% for ROSC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.3% for ROSC and -49.8% for SQLV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ROSC charges 0.34% per year while SQLV charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $60 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ROSC currently yields 1.99% against 1.06% for SQLV.
Holdings Overlap
42.3% of ROSC's money is in holdings SQLV also owns. 38.8% of SQLV's money is in holdings ROSC also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
110 positions in common, counted across the 313 positions we hold weights for in ROSC and 302 in SQLV, against full books of 319 and 627.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 187 positions for SQLV that do not appear in our book for ROSC (60.1% of the fund), and 190 for ROSC that do not appear in SQLV (51.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ROSC | Weight in SQLV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAEHaemonetics Corp | 1.01% | 0.46% | 0.55% |
| HRMYHarmony Biosciences, Llc | 1.01% | 0.40% | 0.61% |
| IDTIdt Corp | 0.99% | 0.38% | 0.61% |
| MDMednax | 0.98% | 0.34% | 0.64% |
| NHCNational Healthcare Corporation | 1.01% | 0.30% | 0.71% |
| PRDOPerdoceo Education Corp | 0.78% | 0.48% | 0.30% |
| TDCTeradata Corp | 0.95% | 0.30% | 0.65% |
| CALMCal-maine Foods Inc | 0.84% | 0.39% | 0.45% |
| CNXNPc Connection Inc | 0.72% | 0.48% | 0.24% |
| PLUSEplus Inc | 0.99% | 0.19% | 0.80% |
42.3% of ROSC is already inside SQLV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ROSC or SQLV?
ROSC has an expense ratio of 0.34% while SQLV charges 0.60%. ROSC is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ROSC or SQLV?
Over the past year ROSC returned +23.06% vs +23.79% for SQLV, so SQLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), ROSC annualized +8.26% vs +8.84% for SQLV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ROSC or SQLV?
SQLV has been the more volatile fund at 22.5% annualized versus 19.3% for ROSC. Worst drawdown: ROSC -46.3% vs SQLV -49.8%.
Should I hold both ROSC and SQLV?
ROSC and SQLV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ROSC and SQLV?
42.3% of ROSC's money is in holdings SQLV also owns. 38.8% of SQLV's is in holdings ROSC also owns. They hold 110 positions in common, counted across the 313 positions we hold weights for in ROSC and 302 in SQLV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ROSC or SQLV?
ROSC yields 1.99% while SQLV yields 1.06%, so ROSC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SQLV better than ROSC?
ROSC has a lower expense ratio. ROSC led over 3Y and 5Y, SQLV over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. SQLV is less concentrated, with 7.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 9.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.