RPV vs VTI
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RPV or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RPV led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RPV is less concentrated, with 21.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RPV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.24% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 377 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +15.45%Best | +14.35% |
| 1Y Return | +25.13%Best | +17.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.69% | +22.47%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.37% | +12.62%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.1% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -76.8% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,133 | $18,117Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 21.4%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 7, 2006 to Oct 13, 2026 (20.6 years).
RPV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20.6 years both funds cover.
RPV vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RPV returned +25.13% while VTI returned +17.97%. Year to date, RPV is up 15.45% versus a gain of 14.35% for VTI.
Over three years, RPV compounded at +20.69% per year against +22.47% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.37% and +12.62% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.51% annualized vs +7.68%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RPV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.1% compared with 15.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.8% for RPV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RPV charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RPV currently yields 2.24% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
97.6% of RPV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 9.5% of VTI's money is in holdings RPV also owns.
Most of RPV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, RPV as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
117 positions in common, counted across the 120 positions we hold weights for in RPV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 377 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,035 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RPV (87.9% of the fund), and 3 for RPV that do not appear in VTI (2.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RPV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNCCentene | 2.65% | 0.04% | 2.61% |
| HUMHumana Inc. | 2.39% | 0.06% | 2.33% |
| ADMArcher-daniels D | 2.35% | 0.05% | 2.30% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 2.36% | 0.02% | 2.34% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 2.11% | 0.09% | 2.02% |
| VLOValero Energy | 2.01% | 0.13% | 1.88% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 1.93% | 0.12% | 1.81% |
| CVSCvs Health Corp. | 1.83% | 0.18% | 1.65% |
| FFord Motor Co | 1.88% | 0.08% | 1.80% |
| TGTTARGET CORP | 1.86% | 0.09% | 1.77% |
97.6% of RPV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RPV or VTI?
RPV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RPV or VTI?
Over the past year RPV returned +25.13% vs +17.97% for VTI, so RPV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), RPV annualized +7.68% vs +9.51% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RPV or VTI?
RPV has been the more volatile fund at 22.1% annualized versus 15.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RPV -76.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RPV and VTI?
RPV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RPV and VTI?
97.6% of RPV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 9.5% of VTI's is in holdings RPV also owns. They hold 117 positions in common, counted across the 120 positions we hold weights for in RPV and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RPV or VTI?
RPV yields 2.24% while VTI yields 1.03%, so RPV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RPV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RPV led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RPV is less concentrated, with 21.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.