RWK vs VTI
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RWK or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RWK led over the full window, VTI over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. RWK is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RWK | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.3B | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 792 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +11.43% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.97% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.84% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.61% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.6% | 16.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.9% | -52.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,557 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 20.7%Best | 33.5% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 20, 2008 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 22, 2008 to Oct 14, 2026 (18.6 years).
RWK vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.6 years both funds cover.
RWK vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RWK returned +14.97% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, RWK is up 11.43% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, RWK compounded at +16.84% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.61% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, RWK has the edge at +10.17% annualized vs +10.16%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RWK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 16.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.9% for RWK and -52.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RWK charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RWK currently yields 1.10% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.2% of RWK's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.8% of VTI's money is in holdings RWK also owns.
Most of RWK is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
394 positions in common, counted across the 399 positions we hold weights for in RWK and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 792 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 806 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RWK (92.9% of the fund), and 4 for RWK that do not appear in VTI (0.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RWK | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 196170:KRAlteogen Inc | 3.36% | 0.01% | 3.35% |
| SNXSynnex Corp | 3.06% | 0.02% | 3.04% |
| PFGCPerformance Food Group Co | 2.71% | 0.02% | 2.69% |
| AALAmerican Airlines Group Inc. | 2.38% | 0.01% | 2.37% |
| MOHMolina Healthcare Inc | 1.77% | 0.01% | 1.76% |
| ARWArrow Electronics Inc. | 1.65% | 0.01% | 1.64% |
| USFDUS Foods Holding Corp | 1.63% | 0.03% | 1.60% |
| PBFPbf Energy Inc | 1.48% | 0.01% | 1.47% |
| DINOHF Sinclair Corp | 1.33% | 0.02% | 1.31% |
| AVTAvnet Inc | 1.31% | 0.01% | 1.30% |
98.2% of RWK is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RWK or VTI?
RWK has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RWK or VTI?
Over the past year RWK returned +14.97% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), RWK annualized +10.17% vs +10.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RWK or VTI?
RWK has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 16.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RWK -56.9% vs VTI -52.6%.
Should I hold both RWK and VTI?
RWK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RWK and VTI?
98.2% of RWK's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.8% of VTI's is in holdings RWK also owns. They hold 394 positions in common, counted across the 399 positions we hold weights for in RWK and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RWK or VTI?
RWK yields 1.10% while VTI yields 1.06%, so RWK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RWK?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RWK led over the full window, VTI over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. RWK is less concentrated, with 20.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.