RWLC vs STEW
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF vs SRH Total Return Fund
Which is better, RWLC or STEW?
RWLC has been ahead.
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. RWLC led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RWLC | STEW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32%Best | 2.28% |
| AUM | $100M | $2.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 12.70% | 3.39% |
| Holdings | 208 | 24 |
| YTD Return | +18.51%Best | -0.38% |
| 1Y Return | - | +3.95% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.13% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.90% |
| Fund Family | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund | Paralel Advisors LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2021 | Jan 31, 2002 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
RWLC vs STEW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RWLC vs STEW Performance
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF (RWLC) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund and SRH Total Return Fund (STEW) is an ETF from Paralel Advisors LLC. Year to date, RWLC is up 18.51% versus a loss of 0.38% for STEW.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RWLC charges 0.32% per year while STEW charges 2.28%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $228 annually, a gap of $196 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RWLC currently yields 12.70% against 3.39% for STEW.
Holdings Overlap
At least 5.4% of RWLC's money is in holdings STEW also owns.
Stated as a floor: for STEW, our book for it covers 93.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
RWLC and STEW share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in RWLC and 21 in STEW, against full books of 208 and 24.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RWLC and STEW you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RWLC or STEW?
RWLC has an expense ratio of 0.32% while STEW charges 2.28%. RWLC is the cheaper option, by $196 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between RWLC and STEW?
At least 5.4% of RWLC's money is in holdings STEW also owns. Our book for STEW is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in RWLC and 21 in STEW.
Which pays a higher dividend, RWLC or STEW?
RWLC yields 12.70% while STEW yields 3.39%, so RWLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is STEW better than RWLC?
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. RWLC led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.