RWLC vs VOLT
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF vs Tema Electrification ETF
Which is better, RWLC or VOLT?
VOLT has been ahead.
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. VOLT led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 84.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RWLC | VOLT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $100M | $742M |
| Dividend Yield | 12.70% | 0.37% |
| Holdings | 208 | 30 |
| YTD Return | +18.51%Best | +18.20% |
| 1Y Return | - | +18.09% |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.2%Best | 84.6% |
| Fund Family | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund | Tema Global Limited |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2021 | Dec 3, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
RWLC vs VOLT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RWLC vs VOLT Performance
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF (RWLC) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) is an ETF from Tema Global Limited. Year to date, RWLC is up 18.51% versus a gain of 18.20% for VOLT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RWLC charges 0.32% per year while VOLT charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $75 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RWLC currently yields 12.70% against 0.37% for VOLT.
Holdings Overlap
0.2% of RWLC's money is in holdings VOLT also owns. 15.3% of VOLT's money is in holdings RWLC also owns.
VOLT and RWLC share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in RWLC and 27 in VOLT, against full books of 208 and 30.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 2 positions for VOLT that do not appear in our book for RWLC (0.3% of the fund), and 98 for RWLC that do not appear in VOLT (98.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RWLC | Weight in VOLT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALBAlbemarle Corp. | 0.23% | 15.35% | 15.12% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RWLC and VOLT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RWLC or VOLT?
RWLC has an expense ratio of 0.32% while VOLT charges 0.75%. RWLC is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between RWLC and VOLT?
15.3% of VOLT's money is in holdings RWLC also owns. 15.3% of VOLT's is in holdings RWLC also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in RWLC and 27 in VOLT.
Which pays a higher dividend, RWLC or VOLT?
RWLC yields 12.70% while VOLT yields 0.37%, so RWLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOLT better than RWLC?
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. VOLT led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 84.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.