RWLC vs WELD
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF vs Tema US Manufacturing & Reshoring ETF
Which is better, RWLC or WELD?
WELD has been ahead.
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. WELD led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RWLC | WELD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $100M | $270M |
| Dividend Yield | 12.70% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 208 | 94 |
| YTD Return | +18.51%Best | -16.87% |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.2%Best | 60.8% |
| Fund Family | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund | Tema Global Limited |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2021 | May 10, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
RWLC vs WELD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RWLC vs WELD Performance
Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF (RWLC) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund and Tema US Manufacturing & Reshoring ETF (WELD) is an ETF from Tema Global Limited. Year to date, RWLC is up 18.51% versus a loss of 16.87% for WELD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RWLC charges 0.32% per year while WELD charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $75 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RWLC currently yields 12.70% against 0.25% for WELD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 101 holdings in RWLC and 42 in WELD, totalling 98.8% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in RWLC and 42 in WELD, against full books of 208 and 94.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for WELD that do not appear in our book for RWLC (41.1% of the fund), and 99 for RWLC that do not appear in WELD (98.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RWLC and WELD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RWLC or WELD?
RWLC has an expense ratio of 0.32% while WELD charges 0.75%. RWLC is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, RWLC or WELD?
RWLC yields 12.70% while WELD yields 0.25%, so RWLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WELD better than RWLC?
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. WELD led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.