SBTU vs VTI
T-REX 2x Long SBET Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SBTU or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SBTU led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SBTU | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 3 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +272.06%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +41.35%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1793.2% | 13.1%Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
SBTU vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SBTU vs VTI Performance
T-REX 2x Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) is an ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SBTU returned +41.35% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, SBTU is up 272.06% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SBTU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 1793.2% compared with 13.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.14. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SBTU charges 1.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SBTU currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SBTU and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SBTU or VTI?
SBTU has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $147 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SBTU or VTI?
Over the past year SBTU returned +41.35% vs +16.63% for VTI, so SBTU leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SBTU or VTI?
SBTU has been the more volatile fund at 1793.2% annualized versus 13.1% for VTI.
Should I hold both SBTU and VTI?
SBTU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.14, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SBTU or VTI?
SBTU yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SBTU?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SBTU led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.