SKYU vs VTI
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SKYU or VTI?
Trading-Inverse Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SKYU led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SKYU | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.45% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 67 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +45.99%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +30.62%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +45.02%Best | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.55% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 52.4% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,278 | $17,616Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 19, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 21, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.7 years).
SKYU vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.7 years both funds cover.
SKYU vs VTI Performance
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SKYU returned +30.62% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, SKYU is up 45.99% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, SKYU compounded at +45.02% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.55% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.13% annualized vs +4.28%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SKYU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 52.4% compared with 15.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for SKYU and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SKYU charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SKYU currently yields 0.45% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 15.7% of VTI's money is in holdings SKYU also owns.
Stated as a floor: for SKYU, our book for it covers 60.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and SKYU share little of their money.
60 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in SKYU and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 67 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SKYU | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.08% | 5.11% | 3.03% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.97% | 3.41% | 1.44% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 2.06% | 2.70% | 0.64% |
| PSTGPure Storage Inc | 3.07% | 0.04% | 3.03% |
| DOCNDigitalocean Holdings Inc | 2.58% | 0.01% | 2.57% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 2.16% | 0.28% | 1.88% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 1.95% | 0.35% | 1.60% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 1.94% | 0.30% | 1.64% |
| NTNXNutanix Inc - A | 2.15% | 0.02% | 2.13% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.38% | 0.53% | 0.85% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SKYU and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SKYU or VTI?
SKYU has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SKYU or VTI?
Over the past year SKYU returned +30.62% vs +16.63% for VTI, so SKYU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), SKYU annualized +4.28% vs +13.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SKYU or VTI?
SKYU has been the more volatile fund at 52.4% annualized versus 15.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SKYU -83.0% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both SKYU and VTI?
SKYU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SKYU and VTI?
At least 15.7% of VTI's money is in holdings SKYU also owns. Our book for SKYU is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 60 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in SKYU and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SKYU or VTI?
SKYU yields 0.45% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SKYU?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SKYU led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.