SPY vs ZINC

SPY vs ZINC

Which is better, SPY or ZINC?

Large Cap Blend against All Cap Blend.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. ZINC is less concentrated, with 33.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%.

Lower Fees: SPYLess Concentrated: ZINC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSPYZINC
Expense Ratio0.09%Best0.55%
AUM$823.2B$9M
Dividend Yield0.99%0.00%
Holdings1,51554
YTD Return+13.53%Best+2.84%
1Y Return+17.47%-
3Y Return (annualized)+22.36%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.21%-
Top 10 Weight38.2%33.9%Best
Fund FamilyState Street Investment ManagementZacks
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendAll Cap Blend
InceptionJan 22, 1993Jun 2, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

SPY vs ZINC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

SPY vs ZINC Performance

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Zacks Income ETF (ZINC) is an ETF from Zacks. Year to date, SPY is up 13.53% versus a gain of 2.84% for ZINC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SPY charges 0.09% per year while ZINC charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $55 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPY currently yields 0.99% against 0.00% for ZINC.

Holdings Overlap

SPY already in ZINC7.1%
ZINC already in SPY75.4%

7.1% of SPY's money is in holdings ZINC also owns. 75.4% of ZINC's money is in holdings SPY also owns.

Most of ZINC is already inside SPY. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

41 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SPY and 57 in ZINC, against full books of 1,515 and 54.

What only one of them owns

Measured across the 504 and 57 positions we hold weights for.

SPY holds 455 positions ZINC does not, 91.9% of the fund.

Largest: NVDA 7.78%, AAPL 7.45%, MSFT 5.71%, AMZN 3.78%, GOOGL 3.12%

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SPYWeight in ZINCDifference
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.43%4.19%2.76%
MOAltria Group Inc0.18%4.63%4.45%
CVXChevron Corp0.60%3.41%2.81%
VLOValero Energy0.17%3.51%3.34%
STXSeagate Technolo0.27%2.83%2.56%
TROWT Rowe Price Grp0.03%2.96%2.93%
PNWPinnacle West Corp0.02%2.94%2.92%
FITBFifth Third Bancorp0.07%2.64%2.57%
XOMExxonmobil Corp.1.04%1.61%0.57%
PFEPfizer Inc0.24%2.31%2.07%

75.4% of ZINC is already inside SPY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SPYZINC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SPY or ZINC?

SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while ZINC charges 0.55%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between SPY and ZINC?

75.4% of ZINC's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 75.4% of ZINC's is in holdings SPY also owns. They hold 41 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SPY and 57 in ZINC.

Which pays a higher dividend, SPY or ZINC?

SPY yields 0.99% while ZINC yields 0.00%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZINC better than SPY?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. ZINC is less concentrated, with 33.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.