TEST vs VTI
YieldMax TSLA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, TEST or VTI?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TEST | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.01% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 26.39% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 26 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -22.89% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | -18.09% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 17, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
TEST vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
TEST vs VTI Performance
YieldMax TSLA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (TEST) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TEST returned -18.09% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, TEST is down 22.89% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TEST charges 1.01% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $101 vs $3 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TEST currently yields 26.39% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in TEST and 3,441 in VTI, totalling 54.0% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in TEST and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 26 and 3,524.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of TEST and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TEST or VTI?
TEST has an expense ratio of 1.01% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $98 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TEST or VTI?
Over the past year TEST returned -18.09% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, TEST or VTI?
TEST yields 26.39% while VTI yields 1.06%, so TEST currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than TEST?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.