TMID vs VYM

TMID vs VYM

Which is better, TMID or VYM?

Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. TMID is less concentrated, with 9.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.8%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: TMID

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTMIDVYM
Expense Ratio0.47%0.04%Best
AUM$12M$78.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.37%
Holdings391608
YTD Return+0.46%+11.83%Best
1Y Return-+15.96%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.60%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.51%
Top 10 Weight9.6%Best25.8%
Fund FamilyT.Rowe PriceVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionSep 16, 2026Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

TMID vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

TMID vs VYM Performance

T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Equity Research ETF (TMID) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, TMID is up 0.46% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TMID charges 0.47% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $4 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TMID currently yields 0.00% against 2.37% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

TMID already in VYM28.2%
VYM already in TMID10.7%

28.2% of TMID's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 10.7% of VYM's money is in holdings TMID also owns.

TMID and VYM share little of their money.

114 positions in common, counted across the 391 positions we hold weights for in TMID and 602 in VYM, against full books of 391 and 608.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 460 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for TMID (87.1% of the fund), and 252 for TMID that do not appear in VYM (66.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in TMIDWeight in VYMDifference
PSXPhillips 661.14%0.40%0.74%
MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp0.64%0.44%0.20%
HUMHumana Inc.0.64%0.19%0.45%
EXCExelon0.60%0.18%0.42%
PRPermian Resource0.70%0.07%0.63%
YUMYum! Brands, Inc.0.60%0.17%0.43%
FANGDiamondback Energy Inc - Common0.61%0.15%0.46%
AEEAmeren Corporation Utilities0.63%0.12%0.51%
HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co0.46%0.28%0.18%
BDXBecton Dickinson And Co.0.49%0.22%0.27%

28.2% of TMID is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

TMIDVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TMID or VYM?

TMID has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between TMID and VYM?

28.2% of TMID's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 10.7% of VYM's is in holdings TMID also owns. They hold 114 positions in common, counted across the 391 positions we hold weights for in TMID and 602 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, TMID or VYM?

TMID yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than TMID?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. TMID is less concentrated, with 9.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.