TRUM vs VYM

TRUM vs VYM

Which is better, TRUM or VYM?

VYM costs less.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 79.0%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTRUMVYM
Expense Ratio0.15%0.04%Best
AUM$247,081$78.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.37%
Holdings54608
YTD Return+0.45%+11.83%Best
1Y Return-+15.96%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.60%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.51%
Top 10 Weight79.0%25.8%Best
Fund FamilyVanEckVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionJul 7, 2026Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

TRUM vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

TRUM vs VYM Performance

VanEck Materials TruSector ETF (TRUM) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, TRUM is up 0.45% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TRUM charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TRUM currently yields 0.00% against 2.37% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

TRUM already in VYM49.3%
VYM already in TRUM2.8%

49.3% of TRUM's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.8% of VYM's money is in holdings TRUM also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

15 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in TRUM and 602 in VYM, against full books of 54 and 608.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 558 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for TRUM (95.1% of the fund), and 9 for TRUM that do not appear in VYM (45.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in TRUMWeight in VYMDifference
LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares17.80%0.91%16.89%
NEMNewmont Corp Common9.84%0.54%9.30%
APDAir Products & Chemicals Inc.4.82%0.27%4.55%
NUENucor Corp.4.14%0.22%3.92%
PPGPpg Industries Inc.1.55%0.10%1.45%
SWSmurfit Westrock1.53%0.10%1.43%
IFFInternational Flavors & Fragrances Inc.1.41%0.09%1.32%
DOWDow Inc.1.32%0.09%1.23%
PKGPackaging Corp. Of America1.32%0.08%1.24%
AMCRAmcor Ltd.1.28%0.09%1.19%

49.3% of TRUM is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

TRUMVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TRUM or VYM?

TRUM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between TRUM and VYM?

49.3% of TRUM's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.8% of VYM's is in holdings TRUM also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in TRUM and 602 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, TRUM or VYM?

TRUM yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than TRUM?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 79.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.