VTI vs XBCI
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF
Which is better, VTI or XBCI?
Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XBCI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.98% |
| AUM | $689.2B | $206M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 23.75% |
| Holdings | 3,524 | 7 |
| YTD Return | +13.02%Best | +0.79% |
| 1Y Return | +16.63% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.97% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.99% | - |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | NEOS |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Feb 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
VTI vs XBCI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VTI vs XBCI Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) is an ETF from NEOS. Year to date, VTI is up 13.02% versus a gain of 0.79% for XBCI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XBCI charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $98 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.06% against 23.75% for XBCI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 3,441 holdings in VTI and 5 in XBCI, totalling 98.1% and 30.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 3,441 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 5 in XBCI, against full books of 3,524 and 7.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VTI and XBCI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XBCI?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XBCI charges 0.98%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $95 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XBCI?
VTI yields 1.06% while XBCI yields 23.75%, so XBCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XBCI better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.