VYM vs XBCI
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF
Which is better, VYM or XBCI?
Large Cap Value against Multi Alternative.
VYM has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VYM | XBCI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04%Best | 0.98% |
| AUM | $78.9B | $206M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.37% | 23.75% |
| Holdings | 608 | 7 |
| YTD Return | +11.83%Best | +0.79% |
| 1Y Return | +15.96% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.60% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.51% | - |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | NEOS |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2006 | Feb 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
VYM vs XBCI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VYM vs XBCI Performance
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) is an ETF from NEOS. Year to date, VYM is up 11.83% versus a gain of 0.79% for XBCI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VYM charges 0.04% per year while XBCI charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $98 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.37% against 23.75% for XBCI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 602 holdings in VYM and 5 in XBCI, totalling 100.0% and 30.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 602 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 5 in XBCI, against full books of 608 and 7.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VYM and XBCI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VYM or XBCI?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while XBCI charges 0.98%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $94 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or XBCI?
VYM yields 2.37% while XBCI yields 23.75%, so XBCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XBCI better than VYM?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.