ACVU vs BKDV
Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF vs BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF
Which is better, ACVU or BKDV?
BKDV has been ahead.
ACVU has a lower expense ratio. BKDV led over 1Y. BKDV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVU | BKDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $274M | $2.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.74% | 0.53% |
| Holdings | 107 | 84 |
| YTD Return | +8.50% | +17.11%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +23.83% |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.5% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | BNY Mellon Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2023 | Nov 1, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ACVU vs BKDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACVU vs BKDV Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management. Year to date, ACVU is up 8.50% versus a gain of 17.11% for BKDV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVU charges 0.45% per year while BKDV charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $60 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVU currently yields 1.74% against 0.53% for BKDV.
Holdings Overlap
47.1% of ACVU's money is in holdings BKDV also owns. 46.9% of BKDV's money is in holdings ACVU also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
26 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 79 in BKDV, against full books of 107 and 84.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 110 and 79 positions we hold weights for.
BKDV holds 51 positions ACVU does not, 51.1% of the fund.
Largest: JPM 4.03%, AIZ 2.44%, TMO 2.10%, FITB 1.80%, CL 1.79%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACVU | Weight in BKDV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.87% | 6.02% | 0.85% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.69% | 4.98% | 2.71% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.85% | 3.28% | 1.57% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.32% | 2.74% | 0.42% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 2.01% | 2.58% | 0.57% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 1.47% | 2.65% | 1.18% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.81% | 2.21% | 0.40% |
| CBChubb Ltd Common Stock Usd 24.15 | 3.24% | 0.77% | 2.47% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 2.17% | 1.76% | 0.41% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.36% | 1.12% | 1.24% |
47.1% of ACVU is already inside BKDV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVU or BKDV?
ACVU has an expense ratio of 0.45% while BKDV charges 0.60%. ACVU is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVU and BKDV?
47.1% of ACVU's money is in holdings BKDV also owns. 46.9% of BKDV's is in holdings ACVU also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 79 in BKDV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVU or BKDV?
ACVU yields 1.74% while BKDV yields 0.53%, so ACVU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BKDV better than ACVU?
ACVU has a lower expense ratio. BKDV led over 1Y. BKDV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.