ACVU vs FELV
Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF
Which is better, ACVU or FELV?
FELV has been ahead.
FELV has a lower expense ratio. FELV led over 1Y. FELV is less concentrated, with 30.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVU | FELV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $274M | $3.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.74% | 1.43% |
| Holdings | 107 | 364 |
| YTD Return | +8.50% | +22.64%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +29.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.98% |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.5% | 30.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2023 | Nov 20, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ACVU vs FELV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACVU vs FELV Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Year to date, ACVU is up 8.50% versus a gain of 22.64% for FELV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVU charges 0.45% per year while FELV charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $18 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVU currently yields 1.74% against 1.43% for FELV.
Holdings Overlap
66.1% of ACVU's money is in holdings FELV also owns. 41.7% of FELV's money is in holdings ACVU also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
58 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 389 in FELV, against full books of 107 and 364.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 110 and 389 positions we hold weights for.
FELV holds 277 positions ACVU does not, 57.2% of the fund.
Largest: JPM 2.62%, CVX 1.21%, PG 0.99%, PFE 0.93%, RTX 0.89%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACVU | Weight in FELV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.87% | 6.20% | 0.67% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.69% | 4.67% | 3.02% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.85% | 6.50% | 1.65% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 2.01% | 3.04% | 1.03% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 1.83% | 1.91% | 0.08% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.32% | 1.29% | 1.03% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.36% | 0.92% | 1.44% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.81% | 1.25% | 0.56% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 2.06% | 0.97% | 1.09% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 2.17% | 0.69% | 1.48% |
66.1% of ACVU is already inside FELV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVU or FELV?
ACVU has an expense ratio of 0.45% while FELV charges 0.18%. FELV is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVU and FELV?
66.1% of ACVU's money is in holdings FELV also owns. 41.7% of FELV's is in holdings ACVU also owns. They hold 58 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 389 in FELV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVU or FELV?
ACVU yields 1.74% while FELV yields 1.43%, so ACVU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FELV better than ACVU?
FELV has a lower expense ratio. FELV led over 1Y. FELV is less concentrated, with 30.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.