ACVU vs FLCV

ACVU vs FLCV

Which is better, ACVU or FLCV?

FLCV has been ahead.

FLCV has a lower expense ratio. FLCV led over 1Y. FLCV is less concentrated, with 31.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%.

Lower Fees: FLCVHigher Returns (1Y): FLCVLess Concentrated: FLCV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACVUFLCV
Expense Ratio0.45%0.32%Best
AUM$274M$211M
Dividend Yield1.74%0.72%
Holdings107252
YTD Return+8.50%+18.52%Best
1Y Return-+23.69%
Top 10 Weight35.5%31.0%Best
Fund FamilyHartford FundsFederated Hermes
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 13, 2023Jul 30, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACVU vs FLCV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ACVU against instead:ACVU vs SPYACVU vs QQQACVU vs VOOACVU vs VTIFLCV against:FLCV vs VXUS

ACVU vs FLCV Performance

Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) is an ETF from Federated Hermes. Year to date, ACVU is up 8.50% versus a gain of 18.52% for FLCV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACVU charges 0.45% per year while FLCV charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $32 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVU currently yields 1.74% against 0.72% for FLCV.

Holdings Overlap

ACVU already in FLCV43.0%
FLCV already in ACVU35.7%

43.0% of ACVU's money is in holdings FLCV also owns. 35.7% of FLCV's money is in holdings ACVU also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

24 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 126 in FLCV, against full books of 107 and 252.

What only one of them owns

Measured across the 110 and 126 positions we hold weights for.

FLCV holds 102 positions ACVU does not, 64.3% of the fund.

Largest: INTU 2.07%, TRV 2.01%, COST 1.91%, STT 1.90%, FI 1.83%

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACVUWeight in FLCVDifference
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc6.87%5.80%1.07%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.69%4.38%3.31%
AAPLApple, Inc4.85%6.28%1.43%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.2.36%3.01%0.65%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common2.32%1.59%0.73%
XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd1.83%1.65%0.18%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares1.81%1.58%0.23%
EXCExelon1.63%1.39%0.24%
UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated1.47%0.99%0.48%
GILDGilead Sciences1.20%1.25%0.05%

43.0% of ACVU is already inside FLCV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ACVUFLCV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACVU or FLCV?

ACVU has an expense ratio of 0.45% while FLCV charges 0.32%. FLCV is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ACVU and FLCV?

43.0% of ACVU's money is in holdings FLCV also owns. 35.7% of FLCV's is in holdings ACVU also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 126 in FLCV.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACVU or FLCV?

ACVU yields 1.74% while FLCV yields 0.72%, so ACVU currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FLCV better than ACVU?

FLCV has a lower expense ratio. FLCV led over 1Y. FLCV is less concentrated, with 31.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.