ACVU vs GVLE
Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF vs Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF
Which is better, ACVU or GVLE?
GVLE has been ahead.
GVLE led over 1Y. ACVU is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVU | GVLE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45%Tie | 0.45%Tie |
| AUM | $274M | $40M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.74% | 1.00% |
| Holdings | 107 | 62 |
| YTD Return | +8.50% | +17.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +23.05% |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.5%Best | 49.5% |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Goldman Sachs Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2023 | Jul 31, 2015 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ACVU vs GVLE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACVU vs GVLE Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF (GVLE) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management. Year to date, ACVU is up 8.50% versus a gain of 17.21% for GVLE.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVU charges 0.45% per year while GVLE charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $45 annually. On income, ACVU currently yields 1.74% against 1.00% for GVLE.
Holdings Overlap
24.9% of ACVU's money is in holdings GVLE also owns. 47.1% of GVLE's money is in holdings ACVU also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 32 in GVLE, against full books of 107 and 62.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 110 and 32 positions we hold weights for.
GVLE holds 19 positions ACVU does not, 48.5% of the fund.
Largest: JPM 4.40%, TMO 4.14%, WMT 3.40%, PG 3.29%, NEE 2.78%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACVU | Weight in GVLE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.69% | 9.29% | 1.60% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.87% | 7.82% | 0.95% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 2.06% | 4.77% | 2.71% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 2.01% | 3.99% | 1.98% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.32% | 3.00% | 0.68% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 0.47% | 3.98% | 3.51% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 1.02% | 3.33% | 2.31% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.83% | 2.74% | 1.91% |
| TJXTjx Cos., Inc. | 0.63% | 2.20% | 1.57% |
| HONAHoneywell Aerospace Inc | 0.36% | 2.44% | 2.08% |
47.1% of GVLE is already inside ACVU.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVU or GVLE?
ACVU has an expense ratio of 0.45% while GVLE charges 0.45%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVU and GVLE?
47.1% of GVLE's money is in holdings ACVU also owns. 47.1% of GVLE's is in holdings ACVU also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 32 in GVLE.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVU or GVLE?
ACVU yields 1.74% while GVLE yields 1.00%, so ACVU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GVLE better than ACVU?
GVLE led over 1Y. ACVU is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.