ACVU vs IWD
Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Which is better, ACVU or IWD?
IWD has been ahead.
IWD has a lower expense ratio. IWD led over 1Y. IWD is less concentrated, with 29.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVU | IWD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $274M | $83.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.74% | 1.43% |
| Holdings | 107 | 869 |
| YTD Return | +8.50% | +21.07%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +27.09% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.91% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.56% |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.5% | 29.7%Best |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2023 | May 22, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ACVU vs IWD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACVU vs IWD Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ACVU is up 8.50% versus a gain of 21.07% for IWD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVU charges 0.45% per year while IWD charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $18 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVU currently yields 1.74% against 1.43% for IWD.
Holdings Overlap
86.7% of ACVU's money is in holdings IWD also owns. 40.5% of IWD's money is in holdings ACVU also owns.
Most of ACVU is already inside IWD. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
90 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 871 in IWD, against full books of 107 and 869.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 110 and 871 positions we hold weights for.
IWD holds 703 positions ACVU does not, 57.9% of the fund.
Largest: BRK.A 2.56%, JPM 2.45%, WMT 1.15%, CVX 1.05%, PG 0.92%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACVU | Weight in IWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.87% | 6.06% | 0.81% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.69% | 5.23% | 2.46% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.85% | 6.01% | 1.16% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.32% | 1.71% | 0.61% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 1.83% | 1.85% | 0.02% |
| CBChubb Ltd. | 3.24% | 0.32% | 2.92% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.36% | 1.16% | 1.20% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 2.06% | 0.98% | 1.08% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.81% | 1.18% | 0.63% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 2.17% | 0.81% | 1.36% |
86.7% of ACVU is already inside IWD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVU or IWD?
ACVU has an expense ratio of 0.45% while IWD charges 0.18%. IWD is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVU and IWD?
86.7% of ACVU's money is in holdings IWD also owns. 40.5% of IWD's is in holdings ACVU also owns. They hold 90 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 871 in IWD.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVU or IWD?
ACVU yields 1.74% while IWD yields 1.43%, so ACVU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IWD better than ACVU?
IWD has a lower expense ratio. IWD led over 1Y. IWD is less concentrated, with 29.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.