ACVU vs JAVA

ACVU vs JAVA

Which is better, ACVU or JAVA?

JAVA has been ahead.

JAVA has a lower expense ratio. JAVA led over 1Y. JAVA is less concentrated, with 29.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%.

Lower Fees: JAVAHigher Returns (1Y): JAVALess Concentrated: JAVA

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACVUJAVA
Expense Ratio0.45%0.44%Best
AUM$274M$7.4B
Dividend Yield1.74%1.19%
Holdings107153
YTD Return+8.50%+13.15%Best
1Y Return-+20.54%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.31%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.63%
Top 10 Weight35.5%29.8%Best
Fund FamilyHartford FundsJ.P. Morgan Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 13, 2023Oct 4, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACVU vs JAVA growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ACVU against instead:ACVU vs SPYACVU vs QQQACVU vs VOOACVU vs VTIJAVA against:JAVA vs VXUS

ACVU vs JAVA Performance

Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Year to date, ACVU is up 8.50% versus a gain of 13.15% for JAVA.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACVU charges 0.45% per year while JAVA charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $44 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVU currently yields 1.74% against 1.19% for JAVA.

Holdings Overlap

ACVU already in JAVA56.5%
JAVA already in ACVU44.7%

56.5% of ACVU's money is in holdings JAVA also owns. 44.7% of JAVA's money is in holdings ACVU also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

39 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 151 in JAVA, against full books of 107 and 153.

What only one of them owns

Measured across the 110 and 151 positions we hold weights for.

JAVA holds 111 positions ACVU does not, 55.0% of the fund.

Largest: SCHW 1.65%, META 1.60%, C 1.39%, BRK.A 1.30%, HPE 1.25%

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACVUWeight in JAVADifference
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc6.87%7.63%0.76%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.69%6.29%1.40%
AAPLApple, Inc4.85%3.41%1.44%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.2.36%1.77%0.59%
CBChubb Ltd.3.24%0.39%2.85%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common2.32%1.26%1.06%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.2.17%1.07%1.10%
WFCWells Fargo & Co.1.00%2.13%1.13%
BACBank of America Corp.: Financials0.83%2.19%1.36%
MRKMerck & Company Inc2.06%0.76%1.30%

56.5% of ACVU is already inside JAVA.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ACVUJAVA

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACVU or JAVA?

ACVU has an expense ratio of 0.45% while JAVA charges 0.44%. JAVA is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ACVU and JAVA?

56.5% of ACVU's money is in holdings JAVA also owns. 44.7% of JAVA's is in holdings ACVU also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 151 in JAVA.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACVU or JAVA?

ACVU yields 1.74% while JAVA yields 1.19%, so ACVU currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JAVA better than ACVU?

JAVA has a lower expense ratio. JAVA led over 1Y. JAVA is less concentrated, with 29.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.