ACVU vs JDVL

ACVU vs JDVL

Which is better, ACVU or JDVL?

JDVL has been ahead.

ACVU has a lower expense ratio. JDVL led over 1Y. ACVU is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%.

Lower Fees: ACVUHigher Returns (1Y): JDVLLess Concentrated: ACVU

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACVUJDVL
Expense Ratio0.45%Best0.56%
AUM$274M$948M
Dividend Yield1.74%1.48%
Holdings10741
YTD Return+8.50%+15.90%Best
1Y Return-+21.37%
Top 10 Weight35.5%Best40.0%
Fund FamilyHartford FundsJohn Hancock Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 13, 2023Aug 6, 2025

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACVU vs JDVL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ACVU against instead:ACVU vs SPYACVU vs QQQACVU vs VOOACVU vs VTIJDVL against:JDVL vs VXUS

ACVU vs JDVL Performance

Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF (JDVL) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Year to date, ACVU is up 8.50% versus a gain of 15.90% for JDVL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACVU charges 0.45% per year while JDVL charges 0.56%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $56 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVU currently yields 1.74% against 1.48% for JDVL.

Holdings Overlap

ACVU already in JDVL30.4%
JDVL already in ACVU45.7%

30.4% of ACVU's money is in holdings JDVL also owns. 45.7% of JDVL's money is in holdings ACVU also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

16 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 39 in JDVL, against full books of 107 and 41.

What only one of them owns

Measured across the 110 and 39 positions we hold weights for.

JDVL holds 20 positions ACVU does not, 45.8% of the fund.

Largest: JPM 4.03%, META 3.89%, USFD 3.78%, AMAT 2.59%, DGX 2.53%

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACVUWeight in JDVLDifference
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc6.87%7.48%0.61%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.69%5.77%1.92%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.2.17%3.17%1.00%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.2.36%2.19%0.17%
VVisa Inc Class A1.28%2.78%1.50%
GILDGilead Sciences1.20%2.77%1.57%
FANGDiamondback Energy Inc - Common1.89%2.01%0.12%
NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn70.46%3.25%2.79%
MSMorgan Stanley1.02%2.65%1.63%
DISWalt Disney Co1.56%2.02%0.46%

45.7% of JDVL is already inside ACVU.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ACVUJDVL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACVU or JDVL?

ACVU has an expense ratio of 0.45% while JDVL charges 0.56%. ACVU is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ACVU and JDVL?

45.7% of JDVL's money is in holdings ACVU also owns. 45.7% of JDVL's is in holdings ACVU also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 39 in JDVL.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACVU or JDVL?

ACVU yields 1.74% while JDVL yields 1.48%, so ACVU currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JDVL better than ACVU?

ACVU has a lower expense ratio. JDVL led over 1Y. ACVU is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.