ACVU vs MAVF
Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF vs Matrix Advisors Value ETF
Which is better, ACVU or MAVF?
MAVF has been ahead.
ACVU has a lower expense ratio. MAVF led over 1Y. ACVU is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVU | MAVF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $274M | $93M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.74% | 0.37% |
| Holdings | 107 | 29 |
| YTD Return | +8.50% | +13.01%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +19.46% |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.5%Best | 54.6% |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Matrix Asset Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2023 | Sep 16, 1983 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ACVU vs MAVF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACVU vs MAVF Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is an ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors. Year to date, ACVU is up 8.50% versus a gain of 13.01% for MAVF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVU charges 0.45% per year while MAVF charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $75 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVU currently yields 1.74% against 0.37% for MAVF.
Holdings Overlap
22.6% of ACVU's money is in holdings MAVF also owns. 35.3% of MAVF's money is in holdings ACVU also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
7 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 27 in MAVF, against full books of 107 and 29.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 110 and 27 positions we hold weights for.
ACVU holds 103 positions MAVF does not, 77.1% of the fund.
Largest: CB 3.24%, ABBV 2.36%, JNJ 2.32%, PM 2.17%, MRK 2.06%
MAVF holds 20 positions ACVU does not, 64.7% of the fund.
Largest: GOOG 7.81%, META 5.73%, GNRC 4.35%, TEL 3.81%, MDT 3.54%
35.3% of MAVF is already inside ACVU.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVU or MAVF?
ACVU has an expense ratio of 0.45% while MAVF charges 0.75%. ACVU is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVU and MAVF?
35.3% of MAVF's money is in holdings ACVU also owns. 35.3% of MAVF's is in holdings ACVU also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 27 in MAVF.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVU or MAVF?
ACVU yields 1.74% while MAVF yields 0.37%, so ACVU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MAVF better than ACVU?
ACVU has a lower expense ratio. MAVF led over 1Y. ACVU is less concentrated, with 35.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.