ACVU vs MFSV

ACVU vs MFSV

Which is better, ACVU or MFSV?

ACVU has been ahead.

MFSV has a lower expense ratio. ACVU led over 1Y. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%.

Lower Fees: MFSVHigher Returns (1Y): ACVULess Concentrated: MFSV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACVUMFSV
Expense Ratio0.45%0.44%Best
AUM$274M$618M
Dividend Yield1.74%1.41%
Holdings10764
YTD Return+8.50%+9.21%Best
1Y Return-+12.64%
Top 10 Weight35.5%32.9%Best
Fund FamilyHartford FundsMFS Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 13, 2023Dec 5, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACVU vs MFSV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ACVU against instead:ACVU vs SPYACVU vs QQQACVU vs VOOACVU vs VTIMFSV against:MFSV vs VXUS

ACVU vs MFSV Performance

Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management. Year to date, ACVU is up 8.50% versus a gain of 9.21% for MFSV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACVU charges 0.45% per year while MFSV charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $44 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVU currently yields 1.74% against 1.41% for MFSV.

Holdings Overlap

ACVU already in MFSV38.9%
MFSV already in ACVU46.1%

38.9% of ACVU's money is in holdings MFSV also owns. 46.1% of MFSV's money is in holdings ACVU also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

25 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 60 in MFSV, against full books of 107 and 64.

What only one of them owns

Measured across the 110 and 60 positions we hold weights for.

MFSV holds 34 positions ACVU does not, 50.6% of the fund.

Largest: JPM 4.50%, CI 2.75%, CVX 2.29%, RTX 2.20%, ABT 1.95%

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACVUWeight in MFSVDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.69%5.35%2.34%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc6.87%5.28%1.59%
AAPLApple, Inc4.85%3.09%1.76%
XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd1.83%3.04%1.21%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common2.32%1.66%0.66%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.2.36%1.48%0.88%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.2.17%1.04%1.13%
DUKDuke Energy Corp1.26%1.95%0.69%
MSMorgan Stanley1.02%2.15%1.13%
BACBank Of America Corp0.83%2.25%1.42%

46.1% of MFSV is already inside ACVU.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ACVUMFSV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACVU or MFSV?

ACVU has an expense ratio of 0.45% while MFSV charges 0.44%. MFSV is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ACVU and MFSV?

46.1% of MFSV's money is in holdings ACVU also owns. 46.1% of MFSV's is in holdings ACVU also owns. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 60 in MFSV.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACVU or MFSV?

ACVU yields 1.74% while MFSV yields 1.41%, so ACVU currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is MFSV better than ACVU?

MFSV has a lower expense ratio. ACVU led over 1Y. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.