ACVU vs TALV

ACVU vs TALV

Which is better, ACVU or TALV?

ACVU costs less.

ACVU has a lower expense ratio. TALV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%.

Lower Fees: ACVULess Concentrated: TALV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACVUTALV
Expense Ratio0.45%Best0.49%
AUM$274M$178M
Dividend Yield1.74%0.73%
Holdings10770
YTD Return+8.50%+14.25%Best
Top 10 Weight35.5%33.5%Best
Fund FamilyHartford FundsTransamerica
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 13, 2023Dec 15, 2025

Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACVU vs TALV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ACVU against instead:ACVU vs SPYACVU vs QQQACVU vs VOOACVU vs VTITALV against:TALV vs VXUS

ACVU vs TALV Performance

Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and Transamerica Large Value Active ETF (TALV) is an ETF from Transamerica. Year to date, ACVU is up 8.50% versus a gain of 14.25% for TALV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACVU charges 0.45% per year while TALV charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $49 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVU currently yields 1.74% against 0.73% for TALV.

Holdings Overlap

ACVU already in TALV43.4%
TALV already in ACVU53.6%

43.4% of ACVU's money is in holdings TALV also owns. 53.6% of TALV's money is in holdings ACVU also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

29 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 68 in TALV, against full books of 107 and 70.

What only one of them owns

Measured across the 110 and 68 positions we hold weights for.

ACVU holds 81 positions TALV does not, 56.3% of the fund.

Largest: CB 3.24%, JNJ 2.32%, PM 2.17%, FANG 1.89%, EXC 1.63%

TALV holds 39 positions ACVU does not, 46.3% of the fund.

Largest: JPM 4.00%, PH 2.11%, RTX 1.92%, KO 1.81%, GS 1.63%

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACVUWeight in TALVDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.69%5.28%2.41%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc6.87%5.51%1.36%
AAPLApple, Inc4.85%5.22%0.37%
XOMExxonmobil Corp.1.83%2.97%1.14%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.2.36%2.35%0.01%
MRKMerck & Company Inc2.06%2.00%0.06%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares1.81%2.16%0.35%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity2.01%1.63%0.38%
DISWalt Disney Co1.56%1.57%0.01%
GILDGilead Sciences1.20%1.67%0.47%

53.6% of TALV is already inside ACVU.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ACVUTALV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACVU or TALV?

ACVU has an expense ratio of 0.45% while TALV charges 0.49%. ACVU is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ACVU and TALV?

53.6% of TALV's money is in holdings ACVU also owns. 53.6% of TALV's is in holdings ACVU also owns. They hold 29 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ACVU and 68 in TALV.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACVU or TALV?

ACVU yields 1.74% while TALV yields 0.73%, so ACVU currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TALV better than ACVU?

ACVU has a lower expense ratio. TALV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.