ALRG vs CGUS
Allspring LT Large Core ETF vs Capital Group Core Equity ETF
Which is better, ALRG or CGUS?
ALRG has been ahead.
ALRG has a lower expense ratio. ALRG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. CGUS is less concentrated, with 43.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ALRG | CGUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28%Best | 0.33% |
| AUM | $8M | $12.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.83% |
| Holdings | 51 | 75 |
| YTD Return | +13.91%Best | +11.95% |
| 1Y Return | +18.20%Best | +15.39% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9% | 11.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.3%Best | -9.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $12,860Best | $12,268 |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.1% | 43.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Capital Group (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 8, 2025 | Feb 22, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 8, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
ALRG vs CGUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
ALRG vs CGUS Performance
Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) is an ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) is an ETF from Capital Group (US). Over the past year ALRG returned +18.20% while CGUS returned +15.39%. Year to date, ALRG is up 13.91% versus a gain of 11.95% for CGUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ALRG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 11.7% for CGUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.3% for ALRG and -9.6% for CGUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ALRG charges 0.28% per year while CGUS charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $33 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ALRG currently yields 0.42% against 0.83% for CGUS.
Holdings Overlap
60.7% of ALRG's money is in holdings CGUS also owns. 52.6% of CGUS's money is in holdings ALRG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
22 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ALRG and 68 in CGUS, against full books of 51 and 75.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 37 positions for CGUS that do not appear in our book for ALRG (36.9% of the fund), and 22 for ALRG that do not appear in CGUS (28.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ALRG | Weight in CGUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.79% | 7.05% | 0.74% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.43% | 7.90% | 2.47% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.81% | 2.53% | 6.28% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.79% | 4.75% | 0.04% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.83% | 5.26% | 1.43% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 5.53% | 1.89% | 3.64% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.86% | 4.55% | 1.69% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.68% | 3.68% | 1.00% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.59% | 1.74% | 0.85% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 1.36% | 1.84% | 0.48% |
60.7% of ALRG is already inside CGUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ALRG or CGUS?
ALRG has an expense ratio of 0.28% while CGUS charges 0.33%. ALRG is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ALRG or CGUS?
Over the past year ALRG returned +18.20% vs +15.39% for CGUS, so ALRG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ALRG annualized +21.35% vs +17.03% for CGUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ALRG or CGUS?
ALRG has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 11.7% for CGUS. Worst drawdown: ALRG -9.3% vs CGUS -9.6%.
Should I hold both ALRG and CGUS?
ALRG and CGUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ALRG and CGUS?
60.7% of ALRG's money is in holdings CGUS also owns. 52.6% of CGUS's is in holdings ALRG also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ALRG and 68 in CGUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, ALRG or CGUS?
ALRG yields 0.42% while CGUS yields 0.83%, so CGUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CGUS better than ALRG?
ALRG has a lower expense ratio. ALRG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. CGUS is less concentrated, with 43.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.