AT vs QQQ

AT vs QQQ

Which is better, AT or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricATQQQ
Expense Ratio0.69%0.18%Best
AUM$1M$506.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.42%
Holdings27321
YTD Return-4.10%+19.30%Best
1Y Return-4.10%+22.47%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+26.18%
5Y Return (annualized)-+15.42%
Volatility (annualized)170.7%17.6%Best
Max Drawdown-86.6%-35.1%Best
$10,000 over 16.9 years$28,081$172,896Best
Fund FamilyDefiance ETFs, LLCInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionSep 14, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 16.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 3, 2009 to Oct 14, 2026 (16.9 years).

AT vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.9 years both funds cover.

AT vs QQQ Performance

Defiance Robotics Actuators ETF (AT) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year AT returned -4.10% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, AT is down 4.10% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

AT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 170.7% compared with 17.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -86.6% for AT and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.06. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AT charges 0.69% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $18 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AT currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 27 holdings in AT and 101 in QQQ, totalling 105.3% and 99.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in AT and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 27 and 321.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of AT and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ATQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AT or QQQ?

AT has an expense ratio of 0.69% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, AT or QQQ?

Over the past year AT returned -4.10% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), AT annualized +6.30% vs +18.37% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, AT or QQQ?

AT has been the more volatile fund at 170.7% annualized versus 17.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: AT -86.6% vs QQQ -35.1%.

Should I hold both AT and QQQ?

AT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.06, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, AT or QQQ?

AT yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than AT?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.