CGCV vs HUSV
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF vs First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF
Which is better, CGCV or HUSV?
CGCV has been ahead.
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over 1Y and the full window. HUSV is less concentrated, with 22.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGCV | HUSV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33%Best | 0.70% |
| AUM | $2.1B | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 1.52% |
| Holdings | 146 | 202 |
| YTD Return | +9.26%Best | +6.62% |
| 1Y Return | +11.65%Best | +4.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.12% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.78% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9%Best | 10.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1% | -9.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $13,772Best | $11,800 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.0% | 22.7%Best |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2024 | Aug 24, 2016 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026 (2.3 years).
CGCV vs HUSV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
CGCV vs HUSV Performance
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year CGCV returned +11.65% while HUSV returned +4.78%. Year to date, CGCV is up 9.26% versus a gain of 6.62% for HUSV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HUSV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.8% compared with 9.9% for CGCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for CGCV and -9.3% for HUSV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGCV charges 0.33% per year while HUSV charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $70 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGCV currently yields 1.59% against 1.52% for HUSV.
Holdings Overlap
29.9% of CGCV's money is in holdings HUSV also owns. 15.8% of HUSV's money is in holdings CGCV also owns.
CGCV and HUSV share little of their money.
19 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 101 in HUSV, against full books of 146 and 202.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 80 positions for HUSV that do not appear in our book for CGCV (82.6% of the fund), and 50 for CGCV that do not appear in HUSV (64.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGCV | Weight in HUSV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.07% | 2.27% | 0.80% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 3.00% | 1.70% | 1.30% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.16% | 1.94% | 0.22% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.66% | 0.36% | 2.30% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.70% | 1.13% | 0.57% |
| SBUXStarbucks Corp | 2.48% | 0.27% | 2.21% |
| MCDMcdonald'S Corp | 1.12% | 1.27% | 0.15% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 1.92% | 0.37% | 1.55% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.18% | 0.90% | 0.28% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 1.73% | 0.29% | 1.44% |
29.9% of CGCV is already inside HUSV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGCV or HUSV?
CGCV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while HUSV charges 0.70%. CGCV is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGCV or HUSV?
Over the past year CGCV returned +11.65% vs +4.78% for HUSV, so CGCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGCV annualized +14.93% vs +7.46% for HUSV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGCV or HUSV?
HUSV has been the more volatile fund at 10.8% annualized versus 9.9% for CGCV. Worst drawdown: CGCV -13.1% vs HUSV -9.3%.
Should I hold both CGCV and HUSV?
CGCV and HUSV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGCV and HUSV?
29.9% of CGCV's money is in holdings HUSV also owns. 15.8% of HUSV's is in holdings CGCV also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 101 in HUSV.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGCV or HUSV?
CGCV yields 1.59% while HUSV yields 1.52%, so CGCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HUSV better than CGCV?
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over 1Y and the full window. HUSV is less concentrated, with 22.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.