CGCV vs WBIL
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF vs WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF
Which is better, CGCV or WBIL?
Each has led over a different period.
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over the full window, WBIL over 1Y. WBIL is less concentrated, with 23.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGCV | WBIL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33%Best | 1.55% |
| AUM | $2.1B | $30M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 146 | 142 |
| YTD Return | +8.70% | +14.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.37% | +14.68%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.76% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +6.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9%Best | 15.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1%Best | -25.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $13,706Best | $11,964 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.0% | 23.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2024 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).
CGCV vs WBIL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
CGCV vs WBIL Performance
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year CGCV returned +11.37% while WBIL returned +14.68%. Year to date, CGCV is up 8.70% versus a gain of 14.67% for WBIL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WBIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.9% for CGCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for CGCV and -25.3% for WBIL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGCV charges 0.33% per year while WBIL charges 1.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $155 annually, a gap of $122 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGCV currently yields 1.59% against 0.04% for WBIL.
Holdings Overlap
15.2% of CGCV's money is in holdings WBIL also owns. 14.1% of WBIL's money is in holdings CGCV also owns.
CGCV and WBIL share little of their money.
10 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 64 in WBIL, against full books of 146 and 142.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 53 positions for WBIL that do not appear in our book for CGCV (83.2% of the fund), and 59 for CGCV that do not appear in WBIL (79.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGCV | Weight in WBIL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.72% | 1.65% | 1.07% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.00% | 0.79% | 2.21% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 1.93% | 1.58% | 0.35% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.70% | 1.65% | 0.05% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 0.99% | 2.10% | 1.11% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.57% | 2.15% | 1.58% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 0.81% | 1.83% | 1.02% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 1.55% | 0.71% | 0.84% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.18% | 0.83% | 0.35% |
| TXNTexas Instruments, Inc | 0.72% | 0.84% | 0.12% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CGCV and WBIL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGCV or WBIL?
CGCV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while WBIL charges 1.55%. CGCV is the cheaper option, by $122 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGCV or WBIL?
Over the past year CGCV returned +11.37% vs +14.68% for WBIL, so WBIL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGCV annualized +14.69% vs +8.11% for WBIL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGCV or WBIL?
WBIL has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.9% for CGCV. Worst drawdown: CGCV -13.1% vs WBIL -25.3%.
Should I hold both CGCV and WBIL?
CGCV and WBIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGCV and WBIL?
15.2% of CGCV's money is in holdings WBIL also owns. 14.1% of WBIL's is in holdings CGCV also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 64 in WBIL.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGCV or WBIL?
CGCV yields 1.59% while WBIL yields 0.04%, so CGCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIL better than CGCV?
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over the full window, WBIL over 1Y. WBIL is less concentrated, with 23.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.