CGCV vs WLTG
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF vs WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF
Which is better, CGCV or WLTG?
WLTG has been ahead.
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. WLTG led over 1Y and the full window. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGCV | WLTG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33%Best | 0.74% |
| AUM | $2.1B | $77M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 4.08% |
| Holdings | 146 | 87 |
| YTD Return | +8.70%Best | +7.96% |
| 1Y Return | +11.37% | +13.35%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.48% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9%Best | 11.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1%Best | -17.1% |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $13,706 | $14,329Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.0%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | WealthTrust Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2024 | Dec 6, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).
CGCV vs WLTG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
CGCV vs WLTG Performance
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) is an ETF from WealthTrust Asset Management. Over the past year CGCV returned +11.37% while WLTG returned +13.35%. Year to date, CGCV is up 8.70% versus a gain of 7.96% for WLTG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WLTG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 9.9% for CGCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for CGCV and -17.1% for WLTG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGCV charges 0.33% per year while WLTG charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $74 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGCV currently yields 1.59% against 4.08% for WLTG.
Holdings Overlap
27.4% of CGCV's money is in holdings WLTG also owns. 26.8% of WLTG's money is in holdings CGCV also owns.
CGCV and WLTG share little of their money.
10 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 41 in WLTG, against full books of 146 and 87.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 30 positions for WLTG that do not appear in our book for CGCV (72.0% of the fund), and 60 for CGCV that do not appear in WLTG (69.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGCV | Weight in WLTG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.20% | 2.05% | 4.15% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.72% | 3.87% | 1.15% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 2.11% | 4.44% | 2.33% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.00% | 3.53% | 0.53% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.16% | 4.25% | 2.09% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.04% | 1.91% | 2.13% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.07% | 1.67% | 1.40% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 1.91% | 2.39% | 0.48% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 1.73% | 1.68% | 0.05% |
| RCLRoyal Caribbean Cruises Ltd Common Stock | 0.49% | 1.01% | 0.52% |
27.4% of CGCV is already inside WLTG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGCV or WLTG?
CGCV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while WLTG charges 0.74%. CGCV is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGCV or WLTG?
Over the past year CGCV returned +11.37% vs +13.35% for WLTG, so WLTG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGCV annualized +14.69% vs +16.93% for WLTG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGCV or WLTG?
WLTG has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 9.9% for CGCV. Worst drawdown: CGCV -13.1% vs WLTG -17.1%.
Should I hold both CGCV and WLTG?
CGCV and WLTG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGCV and WLTG?
27.4% of CGCV's money is in holdings WLTG also owns. 26.8% of WLTG's is in holdings CGCV also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in CGCV and 41 in WLTG.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGCV or WLTG?
CGCV yields 1.59% while WLTG yields 4.08%, so WLTG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WLTG better than CGCV?
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. WLTG led over 1Y and the full window. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.