CGXU vs IVV
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CGXU or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. CGXU is less concentrated, with 36.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGXU | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6.7B | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.91% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 78 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +10.84% | +13.90%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.51% | +17.37%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.76% | +22.55%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.6% | -22.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $14,777 | $19,157Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.3%Best | 38.9% |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 15, 2026 (4.6 years).
CGXU vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
CGXU vs IVV Performance
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CGXU returned +16.51% while IVV returned +17.37%. Year to date, CGXU is up 10.84% versus a gain of 13.90% for IVV.
Over three years, CGXU compounded at +17.76% per year against +22.55% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGXU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 15.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.6% for CGXU and -22.1% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGXU charges 0.54% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $3 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGXU currently yields 4.91% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 78 holdings in CGXU and 506 in IVV, totalling 98.6% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 78 positions we hold weights for in CGXU and 506 in IVV, against full books of 78 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 500 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for CGXU (99.4% of the fund), and 9 for CGXU that do not appear in IVV (12.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CGXU and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGXU or IVV?
CGXU has an expense ratio of 0.54% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGXU or IVV?
Over the past year CGXU returned +16.51% vs +17.37% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGXU or IVV?
CGXU has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 15.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CGXU -25.6% vs IVV -22.1%.
Should I hold both CGXU and IVV?
CGXU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGXU or IVV?
CGXU yields 4.91% while IVV yields 1.10%, so CGXU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CGXU?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. CGXU is less concentrated, with 36.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.