CLUB vs IVV

CLUB vs IVV

Which is better, CLUB or IVV?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. CLUB is less concentrated, with 36.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: CLUB

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCLUBIVV
Expense Ratio0.75%0.03%Best
AUM$13M$896.5B
Dividend Yield0.08%1.10%
Holdings62508
YTD Return-0.46%+13.59%Best
1Y Return-+17.54%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.46%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.28%
Top 10 Weight36.7%Best38.9%
Fund FamilyBancreek Capital AdvisorsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 6, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

CLUB vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

CLUB vs IVV Performance

Billionaires Club ETF (CLUB) is an ETF from Bancreek Capital Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, CLUB is down 0.46% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CLUB charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLUB currently yields 0.08% against 1.10% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

CLUB already in IVV57.2%
IVV already in CLUB29.8%

57.2% of CLUB's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 29.8% of IVV's money is in holdings CLUB also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

17 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in CLUB and 506 in IVV, against full books of 62 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 483 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for CLUB (69.6% of the fund), and 3 for CLUB that do not appear in IVV (10.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CLUBWeight in IVVDifference
NVDANvidia Corp3.44%8.44%5.00%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.51%5.76%2.25%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.30%3.68%0.38%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.44%3.00%0.44%
METAMeta Platforms Inc4.00%2.42%1.58%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.36%2.47%0.89%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity3.37%1.41%1.96%
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc3.67%0.66%3.01%
WMTWalmart, Inc.3.30%0.70%2.60%
ANETArista Networks Inc.3.63%0.32%3.31%

57.2% of CLUB is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

CLUBIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CLUB or IVV?

CLUB has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between CLUB and IVV?

57.2% of CLUB's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 29.8% of IVV's is in holdings CLUB also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in CLUB and 506 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, CLUB or IVV?

CLUB yields 0.08% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than CLUB?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. CLUB is less concentrated, with 36.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.