CLUB vs QQQ

CLUB vs QQQ

Which is better, CLUB or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. CLUB is less concentrated, with 36.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: CLUB

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCLUBQQQ
Expense Ratio0.75%0.18%Best
AUM$13M$506.1B
Dividend Yield0.08%0.42%
Holdings62321
YTD Return-0.46%+19.30%Best
1Y Return-+22.47%
3Y Return (annualized)-+26.18%
5Y Return (annualized)-+15.42%
Top 10 Weight36.7%Best46.7%
Fund FamilyBancreek Capital AdvisorsInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMay 6, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

CLUB vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

CLUB vs QQQ Performance

Billionaires Club ETF (CLUB) is an ETF from Bancreek Capital Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, CLUB is down 0.46% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CLUB charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLUB currently yields 0.08% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

CLUB already in QQQ34.8%
QQQ already in CLUB33.8%

34.8% of CLUB's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 33.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings CLUB also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

10 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in CLUB and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 62 and 321.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 83 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for CLUB (62.5% of the fund), and 10 for CLUB that do not appear in QQQ (32.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CLUBWeight in QQQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp3.44%8.33%4.89%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.51%5.76%2.25%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.30%4.07%0.77%
METAMeta Platforms Inc4.00%3.26%0.74%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.44%3.05%0.39%
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies3.64%2.70%0.94%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.36%2.53%0.83%
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc3.67%1.80%1.87%
WMTWalmart, Inc.3.30%2.11%1.19%
FANGDiamondback Energy Inc - Common3.14%0.21%2.93%

34.8% of CLUB is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

CLUBQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CLUB or QQQ?

CLUB has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between CLUB and QQQ?

34.8% of CLUB's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 33.8% of QQQ's is in holdings CLUB also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in CLUB and 101 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, CLUB or QQQ?

CLUB yields 0.08% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than CLUB?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. CLUB is less concentrated, with 36.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.